Vaccine Orthodoxy Crumbles - I Think Not! (Video)

Article posted with permission from the author, Suzanne Hamner

Don’t you just love news article titles like “As vaccine orthodoxy crumbles, cancel culture allegedly hits federal immunization advisory panel”? This was posted by Just The News covering the dismissal of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) chair Kirk Milhoan, a pediatric cardiologist, from Driscoll Physicians Group at Driscoll Children’s Hospital, which is part of DeTar Healthcare System. Milhoan was supposedly fired from his position because he is now chair of ACIP under the Department of Health and Human Services (DHS) headed by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

The very real question is “has vaccine orthodoxy crumbled”? This question will be answered in the conclusion to this article.

Just The News reported:

The committee voted last week to stop recommending the hepatitis B shot at birth and instead wait two months to inoculate babies born to mothers who test negative for the virus. 

President Trump cheered the move and directed HHS to speed up its review of the U.S. childhood vaccine schedule, comparing it with peer, developed countries and the scientific evidence that informs the practices.

The Sons of Liberty Media carried this writer’s article highlighting the current recommendations for the Hepatitis B vaccine, moving from administration at birth to two months of age, has completely missed the mark.

President Trump is behind the times on childhood vaccines. The scientific evidence on childhood vaccines “that informs the practices” has never demonstrated safety or effectiveness based on clinical trial data contained in the package inserts available for public view on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) website. For reference, you can view the Center for Disease Control childhood immunization schedule to review immunizations against the FDA-approved vaccine list. Why does an independent country, the united States of America, need to compare our vaccine schedule with other countries? The scientific evidence speaks for itself. In fact, Aaron Siri testified to as much at the ACIP meeting held recently in Atlanta, Georgia.

What the article at Just The News actually is focusing on to declare “vaccine orthodoxy crumbles” is the alleged reorientation to parental decision-making in ACIP recommendations. Again, an alternative news outlet completely misses the point.

The CDC ACIP committee has always only made recommendations for childhood immunizations. And, for decades, it has been posted on the website “recommended immunizations” – not required, not mandated, but recommended. It has been the medical whitecoat industry and State governments that have viewed and implemented these recommendations as “mandates”.

The CDC ACIP recommendations have been made, not on scientific evidence contained in the FDA clinical trial data relied on for approval, but on the consensus of individuals citing numerous unproven mantras – safe and effective, preventing transmission and infections, saving millions of lives. The worst peddlers of these unproven mantras are Stanley Plotkin, Paul Offit, and Kathryn Edwards, authors of “Plotkin’s Vaccines”. The mantras were even repeated by Vicki Pebsworth at the ACIP meeting before recommending the change to the Hepatitis B vaccine administration from birth to two months of age. And, those who acknowledged issues with clinical trial data and the birth dose still voted to pass all risk and no benefit to two-month-old infants. Only three dissented and those dissenting votes were to uphold the birth dose.

Chair Kirk Milhoan mentioned to a fellow ACIP member that he felt they were still “puppets on a string” instead of an independent advisory board. That’s pretty telling.

Regardless of what the ACIP recommends, States have “cemented” their commitment to “mandating” childhood immunizations in order for children to attend their public indoctrination centers, while State public health departments repeat the aforementioned mantras. The same mantras are repeated ad nauseum by the medical whitecoat industry and Operation Mockingbird lamestream propaganda enemedia.

Here’s the truth – parents have always had the ability to decide whether or not to vaccinate their children, despite ACIP recommendations or State “mandates”. Unfortunately, the State governments “punish” those exercising their right to informed consent by refusing entry into public indoctrination centers. Medical whitecoat industry workers fuel the State mandates by not providing proper informed consent, but tell parents it is required to enter public indoctrination centers, which it is, but never inform parents about exemptions. Why should parents need to get “permission” from States to not vaccinate their children? It is a violation of parental rights contained in the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution for the united States of America. And, the medical whitecoat industry violates parents’ right to informed consent by not providing proper informed consent, period – and not just surrounding vaccines. Add to all this many parents who repeat the statement, “if other parents don’t vaccinate their kids, it puts my child at risk.” Parents got that idea from the medical whitecoat industry – guaranteed.

So, where does the problem lie here? It lies with “vaccine orthodoxy”, which has NOT crumbled. The ACIP just shifted a recommendation for a birth dose of Hepatitis B vaccine for infants born of Hepatitis B negative mothers to two-month-old babies, despite the lack of clinical trial data proving safety and effectiveness with the product not even being tested against any placebo. The orthodoxy is alive and well, as many States and State departments of health are moving to make their own vaccine schedule mandates.

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., as head of HHS,  has not changed anything of significance. The case of Hannah Poling proved a link between vaccines and autism years ago, but her case was shoved under the rug. RFK, Jr., in his Senate confirmation hearings, stated he supported Operation Warp Speed, which brought poisonous bioweapons to the public, and recommended parents follow the CDC vaccine schedule. Since heading HHS, the FDA has approved two additional CONvid-1984 modified mRNA gene therapy bioweapon shots. So much for “vaccine orthodoxy crumbles”.

Nothing has changed. Vaccine promoters claim it is unethical to now do an inert placebo controlled double blind study (the gold standard) on vaccines that have been approved and are on the market. Yet, they unethically support the administration of vaccine products that have not been properly clinical trialed. It tells you their ethics land somewhere between flatulence and bull manure.

The vaccine orthodoxy remains the same. Vaccine orthodoxists are attacking those they view may threaten the current status quo. Unfortunately, they cannot recognize those they view are threatening the status quo are not since Hepatitis B negative mothers can still choose to give their day-old babies a Hepatitis B vaccine based on their medical industry whitecoat’s recommendation, despite what ACIP recommends. And, Hepatitis B vaccines are still being recommended for infants beginning at two months of age despite their lack of risk for the disease. Medical industry whitecoats will certainly push that Hepatitis B vaccine at the 2-, 4-, and 6-month visit.

Friends, it cannot be stated more rigorously to “view with discernment” what is actually taking place and what is being said, even in the alternative media. The “best” that parents are actually getting is “exemptions” to vaccinate their children, when no exemption should be necessary, as the local, State, or federal government has no business in your parental rights. No local, State or federal government has to provide any proof or evidence to parents to substantiate their claims of “safe and effective, preventing transmission and infection”, or “saving millions of lives”. And, the FDA’s own documents, which are available to everyone on their website, do not substantiate any of those claims. Those claims come from vaccine orthodoxists. So far, the “best” ACIP can do, while some claim it is “stacked with anti-vaxxers”, is to shift a recommendation based on an arbitrary age determined by consensus, not science.

Vaccine orthodoxy crumbles? I think not!

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media