Canada has no opposition, and the methods being deployed to guarantee that: Links post 1 for Nov. 1, 2025

1. Unfortunately, a lot of people better connected than I to the political elite in Canada, are coming to the same depressing conclusions we at this site did a year or so ago. The Conservative Party of Canada does not appear to want a political solution for any of the issues caused by the communist revolution of 2020. Pierre Poilevre is looking like a healthier and more credible controlled op than Doug Ford. Certainly a smarter one.

I was really hoping to be wrong on this one.

Here is a tweet from Billboard Chris. A remarkably serious and intelligent man. Not to mention dedicated beyond the imagination of most mortals.

2. Why is there not HOWLING opposition to ALL OF THESE!!! Instead we got the CPC dancing in the isles over criminalizing parents who try and talk their children out of being spayed and neutered before they even have a clue what it means to undergo these procedures.

This is the CPC on the ‘Trans-affirming-Care”/Anti-Conversion therapy bill.

3. Good news for the UK though. Hard working and non-intrusive Vietnamese are about to all get booted out of the country. I guess the Brits will have to learn to do their own nails while trying to avoid being stabbed by a Muslim while you walk your dog.

Some Brits are upset about it though.

4. The importance of this one needs to be understood in its entirety. I am appealing in this case to the Jewish Community in general, and all who support the idea that legislation will mitigate antisemitism.

Communist states operate by dialectics. A word we are all sick of and none more than me. But it is the all encompassing word which includes much of the visible effects we mistake in general, for the cause of things. Like mistaking a building blowing up as the cause of its own destruction, and ignoring the bomb and more importantly, the people who placed that bomb there. Why this site refers to people who describe what is happening to us, rather than why and how as “colour commentary” as in a sporting event.

The state will invent a narrative which requires the people to surrender a critical freedom. The narrative of course, will be false, prompting the five or ten percent of the public who bother to look into it and challenge the narrative to present the truth of it. Usually in a form SC refers to as “an allowable counter-narrative.” How we mean it though, is that instead of looking at the fundamentals of the limits of the state, people then challenge the narrative and the lie it represents, itself.

This then allows the state, once it has the power to remove the freedom under the auspices of the narrative, to then claim the truth of the matter is “disinformation and misinformation” and must for the good of the people be criminalized itself. We saw this repeatedly since 2020 but it has happened for decades before that. Most notably in Holocaust denial laws.

Before I go forward: I have met personally several people who survived the camps. I have heard them speak, seen the tattoos. Merkel (the much hated) even herself in the first years of her increasingly DDR like regime, declassified or opened the archives of THIRTY MILLION NAZI DOCUMENTS in 2007. This was on 26 MILES worth of shelving. You can work out how many kilometres that is yourselves. These are in Bad Arolsen Germany, and open tp public review. She made them open for the families of those that died in the camps. [Erata: The Archives own webpage states 40 million documents]

However despite all this, the concept of criminalizing Holocaust denial is anathema to everything all who fought the Nazis sacrificed for.

It is a Nazi move to mandate an idea by force of law. And beyond the ideological, it doesn’t work. At least in the matrix of a more or less republic minded public, it just creates suspicion that it is hiding a lie. Holocaust deniers often do very very well for themselves. Especially when Jewish groups make them famous like Ernst Zundel. He was a tin-foil hat guy on a street corner in Toronto when a Jewish group and a provincial MP decided to go after him for handing out business cards with a phone number that led to an antisemitic message. Next thing you know he has a publishing business somewhere outside of Canada and last I looked into it, he was doing quite well thank you. The Streisand effect before there was such a term for it.

Those who want to know the truth of the Holocaust, the information is out there, although I doubt there are many actual survivors left. The ones I knew was in the 1970s and they were fairly old then. At least to me at the time.

But once criminalizing Holocaust denial was normalized because of the enormity of the facts at stake, then criminalizing denial of actual state narrative attacks also came into the realm of the acceptable.

We saw that massively during Covid. And while no one was jailed specifically for presenting the truth of the Covid measures, many were severely punished for opposing the state narrative with real science. And I mean the method, as much or more than the stated facts. That the narrative around the lockdowns and mRNA injections had zero basis in science as a methodology. But the people like Denis Rancourt, to grab a name out of a hat, actually did use the scientific method to challenge the narratives, and then come up with different conclusions which in fact did mirror real-world results, also using the scientific method. These people were punished extrajudicially.

That itself is a benchmark of a communist state.

That the various layers of bureaucracy, or their less-than-legal proxy agents like ANTIFA would act against people who challenged a state narrative or power grab. Like a woman who ran an ice-cream shop in Ottawa and contributed $50.00 to the Freedom Convoy before it even got to Ottawa, and found her home, business and children attacked and harassed by ANTIFA as a result. This included a significant amount of vandalism as well as threatening behaviour and intimidation.Her bank accounts frozen harder than her ice cream. Her business had to operate by the grace of those willing to pay cash and willing to be seen there.

And now the precedent is set. The state can invent a narrative attack which then requires a global solution. A pandemic which means everyone gives up, well pretty much all the most basic liberties, a climate crisis which requires all free-market nations to stop doing anything that generates wealth or independence, a denial of the existence of sexual dimorphism which means your children can be spayed and neutered by the state without parental consent, and in fact it is a criminal offence for parents to suggest to their own children that they not be Frankensteined until they are at least old enough to get a tattoo under the dialectical heading of ‘Trans-affirming-Care”.

Canada, like many Commonwealth countries, has faced a number of narrative attacks which are intended to deracinate our liberties and even core identity. Multiculturalism is one of my favourite examples because the word itself is a dialectic. Culture is the basis of law. You cannot have more than 1 culture in one region. Its impossible. It is, as they say, an oxymoron. The concept of private property, how women are treated, how children are raised and so on are all functions of culture, which are codified in law. The very word multiculturalism is an attack on reality and intended to destroy all cultures and world views. You cannot have more than one way of seeing these things. And we are watching the concept of multiculturalism destroy fundamentals of Canada as we sit slack jawed in amazement as entire neighbourhoods are suddenly removed from the people who bought, built and nourished those properties on behalf of people who were never there other than in the most abstract sense of ancestry. [Yes I could explain how this is not about Israel and the Gaza’s but it’s pointless. People are already entrenched in their positions and no amount of facts or history will change it].

A Republic can have a lot of latitude in law, where room can be made for various groups to have minor variances in practice. This is especially visible in family law, where Catholics, Jews and (arguably) Muslims can have their own conditions for divorce and custody. But in theory, these are subordinate to the law of the land, and should either party not agree to the religious ruling they have access to secular law to address their grievances.

Or so it was.

And now, we have this attack which was based on a narrative about mass graves at Residential Schools, abandoned decades ago, and for the purpose of bringing Amer-Indians out of a state of squalor.

There is not only no evidence of these graves, but there is evidence of a lack of graves. Normally a negative in logic is impossible to prove. But if someone says there are mass bodies buried there, and you go look, and there are no bodies, no records of bodies, no complaints from families of missing Children etc. etc. Then you have in fact provided evidence of the negative.

Which makes this a perfect fertilized bed for the next stage of the narrative attack on freedom of thought:

Should someone wish to know the facts about this claim, the book, “Grave Error”, which I think is still legal to own at this moment in time, goes through the case with meticulous detail. Just like the scientists during Covid who detailed the utter fabrications that led to entire herds of sheep masses of people lined up at grocery stores with masks on, denied the right to shop in certain isles of large box stores, but able to roam freely in marijuana shops, liquor stores, McDonalds and so on. Canada, as a data point for this thesis, also has proposed criminalizing “Climate denialism“, although we highly doubt that should it pass, Bill Gates will be charged with it. Clearly Gates is on to his next narrative attack which will have a greater result in terms of limiting freedom such as the use of massive AI server farms to track everything we all do and which cannot possibly be powered by Windmills and Solar panels, and so will need giant Chinese Coal powered plants.

At the end of the day one can argue that the start of this issue in modern times, (as after all, forcing a state narrative on the general public is as old as the state itself) could be laid at the feet of Jewish groups. Some who genuinely believed in a benevolent and truth based state’s ability to limit crimes against a community by making the history of its victimhood sacrosanct, and others who were and are in fact are dialectical organizations who’s intention was to use Jewish identity and victimhood as a weapon against all our liberties. In other words, useful idiots and sophisticated actors. Canada’s pet speech monitor, The dialectically named, “Anti-Hate Network” being just one of many examples of a sophisticated actor who’s purpose is the destruction of liberties and dissemination of hatred against all who oppose state narratives, whatever they may happen to be that day.

And thanks to our total inability to remember first principles, such as not giving a sweet damn if the mRNA shots worked, or were “safe and effective” or not and instead standing fast against the idea that the state had zero right to impose the measures it did, we now have narrative attacks coming at us at Warp Speed on all things which threaten our basic liberties at levels so fundamental most of us are not even aware we have them. Like water to a fish, right up to the moment you take that fish out of the water. Then suddenly it’s all that matters.

Just one last data point as to where this will lead in Canada. Very likely to serious consequences for anyone who criticizes China, or its policies. As it is, if anyone who has a cell phone on them interviewes a protestor in front of the Chinese Embassy in Ottawa, they can expect a series of robocalls in Mandarin as a veiled threat that they know who you are and can get you anytime.

5. Today’s juxtaposition: Canada Vs. the USA

The USA:

Canada:

Canada’s TOP Military official:

Key Details

• Full name: Marie Annabelle Jennie Carignan (often known simply as Jennie Carignan). en.wikipedia.org+1

• She is an officer of the Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) and as of 18 July 2024, she is the Chief of the Defence Staff (CDS) — the highest-ranking military officer in Canada.

The very definition of dialectical destruction. The head of the military which has no actual appearance of competence in military matters (she does appear to have some deployments to hot zones) exactly like the Minister of Health during Covid was a graphic designer with no science background at all, let alone medical, launching a narrative attack on the military itself, such that changes will be made to support narratives such as sexual orientation and gender theory internally, and not fighting a war. This is likely an act of fealty to China. Or if not It may as well be.

I doubt the Christians of Nigeria facing an actual and for real ongoing genocide will be looking to the Canadian military to help them.

Thank you all for your kind attention to this site.