War & Peace & Digital money: three crimes on the super-highway to serfdom

While the entire world and its mother is overflowing with hypocrites desperate to find Vladimir Putin guilty in advance of War Crime trials before any full-scale conflict crimes have gone beyond Western propagandised fantasies, where are those authorities supposed to arrest and try those who add fertility to the s(p)oils of War by destroying the Peace?

I was concerned the other day to discover that the UN War Crimes Commission is run by a Japanese person who looks like she might be the Uglier Sister of Yoko Ono, and sounds like a conclusion-jumper in terms of Guilty verdicts when it comes to the Russian leader Putin

I’m all for expertise on any subject to do with War Crimes, so one must see a Japanese citizen as more qualified than most to comment on war criminality during wars in that – from the Emperor Hirohito downwards – not a single member of the Japanese Establishment has ever apologised for the depraved sadism inflicted upon Chinese, British, American and Burmese servicemen during World War II. I can write with much credibility here, since my father was a witness to the unspeakable cruelty involved.

In order of genocidal psychopathy, the guilty were 1. Stalin 2. Hirohito, 3. Hitler and 4 Moshe Dung. To defeat defendant 3, the West glorified Stalin….and then after dropping two nuclear weapons on defendant 2, embraced the guilty emperor in Tokyo as a laudable defender of democracy against defendant 4. In the same moment, the Allied Powers grabbed all of defendant 3’s V1 and V2 rocket scientists before defendant 1 could capture them.

Now EUNATO is on the case of a Russian Federation that emerged from defendant 1’s geriatric successors poor treatment of The People… but being these days run by a considerably more reasonable and far less ideologically aggressive Orthodox Christian leader called Vladimir Putin.

So who are the War Criminals here?

The multi-mouthed two-faced nature of Western fake democracy is limitless….but sadly, in the sense of ad nauseam rather than ad infinitum.

If you think that makes me an enemy of those States controlled by Secret Services, you’re finally getting it..and I no longer care who knows: The secret US, Canadian, UK, EU and NATO global blocists are, every one of them, traitors to their constitutions. I believe unequivocally that it is the duty of all citizens high and low to restore proper representation and Free Speech in the West.

Applying a gentle foot on the brakes in tackling this task is no longer going to be anywhere near enough: the New Normal and PC are DNC, Blairite, Brussels totalitarian abominations with a thousand pathetic rationales but absolutely no honest raison d’etre for those who value informed tolerance. This isn’t a tickling contest using the Queensberry Rules: from here on, it’s a bare-knuckle kick-boxing fight where not even the scrotal sac is sacred.

The problem with captured media liberty, corrupt elections and digital lies applied to both photography and currency value is that they represent pure Stalinism in the form of 67% Vodka designed to wipe out 100% of human social discernment. That is to say, reality so misinformed it is worthless surreal mendacity: as Plato correctly predicted in his musings, “The fastest road to dictatorship is an uninformed and misinformed electorate”.

But the questions I pose today are these: why is there an abundance of shadowy geopolitical members of the unelected Secret Western States just gagging to define War Criminals who haven’t actually declared war on anyone, or committed any crimes on the scale of shared hypocrisy described here six paragraphs ago­?

In short, should we be looking for Peace [Not War] Criminals?

Geopolitical Peace Criminals agitate for War from which only they can benefit. In the process of doing so, they justify their aggression based on blatantly selective memories of previously signed peace accords…for example, the 2014 ceasefire between Russia and the Ukrainian Russian-speaking pro Moscow areas.

We live in a world where Peace Criminals’ war-mongering crimes far exceed any exaggerated War Crimes invented by their evil allies who long go accepted EUNATO hegemony.

Overall, the questions this issue raises [at an historically sensitive time] is exactly what functions the State is supposed to fulfil in order to deserve the title ‘Free Speech Democracy’.

WHAT IS THE STATE THERE TO DO?

Is there any difference between Peace Criminals and War Criminals? Not a great deal, really: peace criminals agitate to start wars based on feeble territorial claims, whereas war criminals do nasty things to anyone their paranoia sees as a threat once the killing fields have been so totally covered in corpses, nobody’s keeping count any more. It is my contention that Peace Criminals tend to “get away with it”, but War Criminals can be accused by implication and geopolitical propaganda before they do anything….not least because War is bad karma, and Peace is nice, Man – give Peace a chance.

But overriding any of these mendacious linguistics is the far higher pay grade issue – what the blue blithering fookc is the genuinely open free-speech elected central government supposed to be doing?

Being 25 percent Irish by descent, I’d like to kick off with what it’s NOT there to do for citizens of any honest Nation State:

1. Slaughter an elected President in broad daylight

2. Use the judiciary and federal crime institutions to cover up such murder most foul for in excess of sixty years

3. Fix the none-election of an elected President by ballot stuffing, and then refuse to investigate the obvious evidence available

4. Interfere in the affairs of States anything from six to nine thousand miles away

5. Encourage the politicisation of education under the umbrella of “protecting” the citizenry

6. Remove any and all means of citizens overthrowing totalitaranism via the use of a free press for Truth and, in extremis, the Right to Bear Arms.

Don’t mistake my Irish approach to issues as some form of British prejudice: the cultural genius of the Irish is they start with what’s wrong before they get into how things should be organised. This seems to me to be wise rather than whimsical.

So for what it’s worth, this is what free-speech democracy is supposed to be about:

a. To protect the citizen from genuine threats…..not scare them with low grade viruses, fake enemies, warmongering, and experimenting on them with deadly vaccines.

b. We cannot expect reform to come from within the ranks of the gung-ho globalist elites: they have too much to lose and despise free-speech elective democracy.

c. In a ‘free country’, there is a widespread recognition that the most important asset is the cizenry and the maximisation of their potential.

d. The foundations for such a system are familial influences, good social role models and an education system designed to make people question and think, not pc politicised “settled science” that always insists one conclusion is right and another wrong.

e. In a system where freedom is genuinely thought desirable, all education should give students a solid grasp of the rationales underpinning ethics, civics, history and political honesty, so that they are all the more able to discern between what is real, unreal, reportage or cynical propaganda.

f. As long as the legacy and social media are reduced to being a self-censoring State mouthpiece, no reform will be possible and the last iota of Government accountability will rapidly disappear.

g. The driving forces behind Western captive media sets are the secret services, central banks and bloated bourse investment monsters who are central to financialised neoliberal capitalism. We are using a version of capitalism that has failed, that has seen a fall-off in entrepreneurial start ups, and distracts from its cannibalistic format with dangerous neocon geopolitical adventurism overseas.

Hence the growing power of the Peace Criminals…..and the near zero score on having ways to protect our hard-earned freedoms: familial breakdown, education by rote, yesmen journalism, over 90 per cent of all-powerful financial demands representing unbalanced wealth rather than political reform, macro-economic failure and foreign policy sabre rattling….all are present in the Anglo and Eurosphere bloc, all need to go, and tinkering at the edges simply isn’t going to cut it. All the key Western states, political unions and military alliances are near-perfect creations of totalitarian dystopia.

SO….IS NUCLEAR WAR NOW INEVITABLE?

On the contrary: I think nuclear war is highly unlikely, for the following reasons:

i: Although false flagging has come a long way, an incoming nuke missile [ICBM or not] would still be impossible to fake given the RF’s highly sophisticated early warning system. Russia’s foreign ministry and Defence Institute would merely have to visit the UN equipped with tell-tale sound emissions and speed videos plus detection alarms recorded by Moscow to reveal NATO in its various forms from Ankara to London via Washington as the irrefutable culprit.

ii: Far more important than this, there is no way that anyone influential in the Pentagonato axis still believes that using nukes is worth the fissionable pollution and utter infrastructural mess that would follow such madness*

iii: The Sino-American joint mRNA Convid19 vaccine psyop wasn’t undertaken for fun or gain of health function. There has been a Langley-led project since at least 2004 to achieve Unipolar US hegemony without leaving the enemy’s infrastructural wealth unusable.

iv: It’s therefore my belief that the coming war will be dominated by bioweaponry, thus avoiding a 21^st century mistake of conducting a war using the technology of the previous century. (I’m not qualified to comment on RF skills in this area, as I know almost nothing about them.)

* Up until the start of the week before last, I was still of the view that anything might happen. But a sound and usually very reliable source in New York – along with another engagingly logical Slovakian informant – have convinced me that the younger hot-head element in the senior Pentagon ranks have been put back in their surreal Better Dead than Red cage and told to butt out. I can only pray these informants know their stuff.

v: The Big Unknown is precisely where the dots join up here.

The subhead question related to that dot-joining exercise is, “What makes the psychodummies think that – whether he has bioweapons or not – Vlad the canny Lad has the remotest interest in simply playing to given ice-hockey rules as laid out by the arrogant supremacists in the Langley-Washington puck-slamming complex?” It’s a relevant question to ask, because Putin has no track record at all of doing anything so predictable. Frankly, he is far more likely to explain why the Blinkens of this world should be sent to the sin-bin while the rest of us find something more interesting to do with our precious leisure time.

The thing I find terrifying is that the surrealists from Fatso Morgan via MI5 plant Con Coughlin and black[mailed] cocksucker Emmanuelle Macrony, the naval intelligence guys at Wapo, the forked-tongue Trump-hate Champagne liberal fascists at the New York Crimes and other equally bought but gobby Congressmen cannot raise between them an aggregate IQ sufficient to even understand Putinism, let alone analyse it in the context of Russo-East European history.

And on that basis we are, all of us, facing one horrible death or another if just one silly won’t-back-down miscalculation from yet another Nuland or Shapps produces the SNAFU my dad always insisted that War – stripping everything else out – always was, and forever will be.

POST-SCRIPT: NO, IT ISN’T JUST ME….

The trans-human unipolar nightmare scientifico-financial future moves forward on a broad front and at such a speed, at times – what with the rise and rise of the peace criminal, front-stabbing opportunism of Russia’s neighbours and the still enigmatic geopolitical ambitions of Beijing to guess about – one forgets that all of it is merely one level in a multifaceted attack upon free Homo sapiens.

The forced push of banking “service” onto not just internet, but specifically the million-App smart phone, is now so blatant you have to be terminally thick or very young and naive not to notice it.

I’ve done little in the way of currency transfer, bill payment or standing orders online of late, as some degree of cash mountain built up by renting out during the season here in Gambia has enabled me to avoid the experience. But even the mutualised banks now all have their ways of shoving every customer in the Smartphone direction where everything you want to do is made inconvenient, or requires twice as many steps as previously, or simply offers stupid advice.

Example: Nationwide’s little bot asks me “What do you want to do?”

I reply, “Pay an invoice to a French storage company”

The Bot puts up a page, ‘How to send money to a bank outside the EU’ and asks “Was this page useful?”

I respond, unsurprisingly, with “No”. So it gives me a list of Sixty Three alternative pages to wade through.

Then the bank logs me out due to “lack of activity”.

I try to complain. The options are (1) Going back to Barmy Bot the Tin Man or (2) Writing a letter to the Head Office in Swindon. In 2024. From Africa. It’s the stuff that vomit is made of.

So after seventeen years of being a customer, I’ve fired them. They won’t notice: they’re far too busy digitalising what is already devalued fiat currency into lots of utterly worthless winking lights prior to the realisation of Davos Von Schlaphead’s dream, “You shall haff nuzzink unde vee shall be very happy, Dummköpfe ”.

This doesn’t add up to disturbing the Peace or making bioweapon War, but it is the overture to State Banking Fraud on a global scale.

It works for one simple reason: people comply.

Consider these equivalent empty spaces where disapproval used to be:

1. Where are the poll tax riots?

2. Where is the anti-Vietnam War Movement?

3. Where is the defiance to stop obvious Whitehall/Home Office attempts to get us back into the EU?

4. Where is the Solidanarsc that brought down the Sovyet Union?

5. Where are the brave pilots who stopped Hitler in 1940?

6. Where were the ethical MPs when the UK Government welched on the 1950s born Waspi female State pensioners?

Until the next time then…in the meantime, our forebears spin quietly in graves, wondering when and where this generation is finally going to do something to save what they fought and died for.