2 Videos
and both ANALYZED by Galaxy AI….

 

Political Hypocrisy: A Look at the Changing Stance on Violence in Politics

Published September 21, 2025 3 min read Politics

In June 2025, a resolution by Republican majority (sponsored by Democrats and GOP alike) to condemn violence following the assassination of a Democrat legislator received unanimous support. However, by September, a similar resolution faced significant opposition from Democrats, highlighting a stark shift in political attitudes towards violence and political discourse within just three months.

 

In June of 2025, a significant moment unfolded in the political arena when a resolution to honor the assassination of a Democrat legislator. This resolution, which aimed to condemn violence in politics, received unanimous support from the Republican side, showcasing a rare moment of bipartisan agreement on the importance of condemning political violence.

 

The June Resolution

 

The resolution passed in June was not just a formality; it was a strong statement against the rising tide of violence that had begun to permeate political discourse. The assassination of a political figure is a grave event that calls for reflection and a unified stance against such acts. The unanimous vote indicated a collective acknowledgment of the need to protect political figures and uphold democratic values.

 

The Shift by September

 

Fast forward to September, and the political landscape had shifted dramatically. An almost identical resolution was brought forth, again aimed at condemning violence and the assassination of political leaders. However, this time, the response was markedly different. Most Democrats either voted against the resolution or chose not to show up for the vote at all. This stark contrast in behavior within just three months raises important questions about the consistency of political values and the motivations behind them.

 

The Left’s Response

 

The lack of support from the left for the September resolution suggests a troubling trend. It appears that the political discourse has become increasingly polarized, with actions and reactions being dictated more by party lines than by a genuine commitment to democratic principles. The Democrats’ response—or lack thereof—highlights a growing divide in how political violence is perceived and addressed, depending on the political affiliation of the victim.

 

Analyzing the Change

 

What accounts for this significant change in stance? One possible explanation is the evolving nature of political strategy. For many on the left, the focus may have shifted towards a more aggressive stance against perceived threats from the right, leading to a reluctance to condemn violence that could be seen as politically motivated against their own. This shift reflects a broader trend in contemporary politics where the ends often justify the means, and party loyalty can overshadow ethical considerations.

 

The Broader Implications

 

The implications of this shift are profound. When political parties begin to selectively condemn violence based on the political affiliations of the victims, it undermines the very foundation of democratic discourse. It sends a message that political violence is acceptable as long as it aligns with one’s political beliefs. This dangerous precedent could lead to further polarization and a breakdown of civil discourse in politics.

 

Conclusion

 

The events of June and September 2025 serve as a stark reminder of the volatility of political values in the current climate. The unanimous support for condemning violence in June stands in sharp contrast to the divisive response in September, illustrating how quickly political allegiances can shift. As we move forward, it is crucial for all political leaders to prioritize the principles of democracy and the sanctity of life over party loyalty. Only then can we hope to foster a political environment that truly condemns violence, regardless of the political affiliations involved.

 

 

Reflections on Legacy: Honoring Charlie Kirk and the Call for a New Jesus Revolution

Published September 21, 2025 4 min read Religion

 

In this blog post, we reflect on the legacy of Charlie Kirk following his memorial, discussing the impact of his life and death on the Christian community. The author shares insights on their own recent publications, emphasizing a movement towards a deeper understanding of faith and the importance of speaking out against silence imposed by the left. The post highlights the significance of legacy in both personal and collective contexts, urging readers to embrace their faith actively.

 

In a recent video, the speaker reflects on the memorial service for Charlie Kirk, a prominent figure whose life and untimely death have sparked significant conversations within the Christian community. The speaker expresses a mix of admiration and introspection, noting the stark contrast between the anticipated attendance at Kirk’s memorial and their own expectations for a future memorial. This post aims to explore the themes of legacy, faith, and the ongoing movement towards a deeper understanding of Christianity in light of recent events.

 

The Impact of Charlie Kirk’s Legacy

 

Charlie Kirk’s memorial is expected to draw an impressive crowd of 60,000 attendees, a testament to his influence and the impact he had on many lives. The speaker acknowledges the potential for exploitation of Kirk’s death but emphasizes their intention to honor his legacy without capitalizing on the tragedy. They reflect on the importance of maintaining integrity in discussions surrounding Kirk’s life and the broader implications of his message.

 

Personal Reflections and New Publications

The speaker shares their own journey of writing three books in the year following Kirk’s death. Two of these books were completed before the tragic event, while the third, titled “A Lasting Legacy,” was planned prior to Kirk’s assassination. The speaker emphasizes that their work is not an attempt to exploit Kirk’s memory but rather a response to a perceived calling to contribute to the ongoing dialogue about faith and legacy.

 

The Books

1. The Book of Kennedy - Released in August, this book explores themes of life, love, loss, and legacy, resonating with the current cultural climate.
2. Constitutionalist Politics 3 - This book, released before the anniversary of September 11, delves into the intersection of politics and Christianity, encouraging readers to embrace a Christ-like approach to governance.
3. A Lasting Legacy - A short story that was conceptualized before Kirk’s death, this book aims to reflect on the enduring impact of individuals and their contributions to society.
4. [ https://JosephMLenard.us/shop ]

 

The Call to Action

 

The speaker expresses a strong conviction that the left seeks to silence voices like theirs and Kirk’s. They assert that remaining silent would be tantamount to allowing the narrative to be controlled by those who oppose Christian values. Instead, they feel compelled to speak out and contribute to what they term the “Jesus Revolution 2,” a movement aimed at revitalizing faith and encouraging individuals to engage actively with their beliefs.

 

The Role of the Church

 

In the wake of Kirk’s (Kirk, CHURCH, in German) death, the speaker notes an increase in church attendance, reminiscent of the surge seen after September 11. This phenomenon suggests a renewed interest in faith and community, prompting the speaker to hope that their books will play a role in guiding individuals towards a deeper understanding of Christianity. They emphasize the importance of attending churches that teach the full context of the Bible, rather than those that dilute its message.

 

Conclusion

 

In conclusion, the speaker reiterates their commitment to honoring Charlie Kirk’s legacy through their work and their refusal to be silenced. They encourage readers to embrace their faith actively and to participate in the ongoing conversation about what it means to live a life of purpose and integrity. The call for a new Jesus Revolution is not just a response to Kirk’s death but a broader invitation to all believers to stand firm in their convictions and to share their message with the world.

 

As the speaker prepares to watch the memorial service for Charlie Kirk, they reflect on the significance of legacy and the impact one individual can have on countless lives. They invite readers to join them in this journey of faith, encouraging a collective movement towards a more profound understanding of love, loss, and the enduring power of legacy.

 

 

 

 

https://JosephMLenard.us/shop