Great Paper Examining Galctic Cosmic Rays in the Very Relevant Cycle 23 and 24

NUKE PRO: Exposing Truth Anti-Nuclear Information and Resources, and Disaster Preparation Planning: http://nukeprofessional.blogspot.com/

 don’t want to lose this one!

https://emmrem.unh.edu/papers/Schwadron2010SW000567-pip.pdf

The highest energy GCRs produced BE-10, and with 2 prominent peaks at 35,000 and 60,000 years ago

LOL these correspond perfectly with our Local Yellow Dwarfs desire to occasionally go off MicroNova, and maybe not all microNovas are similar.    But pert near 12,000 year cycle is now established.

The most accepted explanation is that the peaks are caused by geomagnetic
101 magnetic field excursions, which is supported by the observed correlation between geomagnetic
102 field strength and 10Be levels in marine sediment records [McHargue et al., 2000; Wagner et al.,
103 2000]. However, this explanation would suggest that the 10Be enhancements should be uniform
104 over the globe, which contradicts the large variations observed at high latitudes where
105 geomagnetic effects are small. Further, Cini Castagnoli et al. [1998] found that the 10Be level
106 starts to increase some 2000 years before the drop in Earth’s magnetic field, as reflected by the
107 magnetization measured in the same core sample. Thus, many of the long-term changes in the
108 cosmic ray fluxes incident on Earth may be due to effects external to the Earth; either due to
109 changes in the shielding of the inner heliosheath or due to changes in the incident fluxes of GCRs
110 from outside the heliosphere.

————————————————- 

And this one, a higher power study of GCR in relation to human health.

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1748-9326/aaa27a

I just have to wonder if “they” are smart enough to plan the Bioweapon release that effects especially old people much more in the solar minimum we are now in?