Evidence Reveals Science As A Pseudoscience - God Theory Debunked

May 17, 2016 (MMD Newswire) — In a recent peer-reviewed article titled“Who Is Telling The Truth, Nature Or Man?” by artist and experimenter, Manuel Morales, [1] unambiguous empirical evidence obtained at TemptDestiny.com revealed that the logic of using effects to establish cause in scientific experiments and observational studies are incomplete due to a fundamental omission error of not factoring both mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive selection variables necessary to conduct the art of science. The Tempt Destiny experiment confirmed that without these two variables, direct selection and indirect selection (see Figure), it is impossible to obtain the existence of an effect, subsequently, it is also impossible to continue to exist without these two origin variables as exemplified in the article via the Final Selection Thought Experiment. Since both experiments are absolute, they serve to empirically confirm without conjecture that a theory of single cause being fundamental, e.g., a single elementary particle (Higgs boson) or a single deity causing the existence of the universe, is not reflective of Nature.

In a recent peer-reviewed article titled “Who Is Telling The Truth, Nature Or Man?” by artist and experimenter, Manuel Morales, [1] unambiguous empirical evidence obtained at TemptDestiny.com revealed that the logic of using effects to establish cause in scientific experiments and observational studies are incomplete due to a fundamental omission error of not factoring both mutually exclusive and jointly exhaustive selection variables necessary to conduct the art of science. The Tempt Destiny experiment confirmed that without these two variables, direct selection and indirect selection (see Figure), it is impossible to obtain the existence of an effect, subsequently, it is also impossible to continue to exist without these two origin variables as exemplified in the article via the Final Selection Thought Experiment. Since both experiments are absolute, they serve to empirically confirm without conjecture that a theory of single cause being fundamental, e.g., a single elementary particle (Higgs boson) or a single deity causing the existence of the universe, is not reflective of Nature.

Ironically enough, the formal recognition of a fundamental omission error of how science is being conducted by a national academy of science with an international editorial board and council of scientists marks a significant development towards the advancement of science for only science can correct itself. As discovered, current methods used to collect data to confirm scientific theories are based on omitted-variable bias [2] which inherently leads to obtaining false-positive results, i.e., pseudoscience.

The omission error is so blatantly transparent that anyone with internet access can confirm for themselves what the art of science has overlooked without needing to read a single scientific document or book. The article mentions how to conduct a simple keyword search in order to distinguish if both origin variables were accounted for in research investigations. Of the tens of millions of online documents, one may find a relative handful (less than 1% of 1%) that mention these two variables in the same research. If so, then further review will be needed to determined how the keywords found were applied as either causal mechanisms of the effects observed or as effects directly or indirectly observed.

This discovery marks an opportunity to advance science from a paradigm based on knowledge of effects (effectual science), to a paradigm based on knowledge of both cause and its effects (causal science). Fortunately, this paradigm shift can be implemented by distinguishing which of the two selection variables caused which effects observed in scientific experiments and observational studies. By being aligned with how Nature works, causal science will be more accurate and cost efficient and thus advance the art for the betterment and well being of us all.

Morales states, “As the findings show, how effects are caused are predetermined in Nature which in turn determines what effects exist. In summary, Nature prohibits existence until a selection can be made or can no longer be made. As such, we have no choice in the matter.”

News 12 Video: https://youtu.be/z8joZ_9DuWU

References:

1. Morales, M.S., Who Is Telling The Truth, Nature Or Man?, News Biomed. Sci. (2016) Vol.13, No. 1. P. 86-90.

2. Morales, M.S., Assumed Higgs Boson Discovery Proved Einstein Right, International Journal of Fundamental Physical Sciences (2012) Vol. 37, p. 44-47. doi:10.14331/ijfps.2012.330035