What to Break the Filibuster For: The Whatfinger Compromise

Should Republicans break the filibuster to end the Schumer Shutdown? Probably not; Democrats will have to end the shutdown anyway. If the GOP is going to break the filibuster, it should be for something more crucial — like the Whatfinger Compromise:

President Trump should champion a temporary suspension of the filibuster, but with ironclad restrictions—lifting it solely to pass comprehensive election reform legislation, as outlined by Gunther Eagleman in his powerful X post below.

Eagleman neatly sums up what needs to be done:

Nuke the filibuster, then pass these simple election laws,

– Proof of Citizenship
– Voter ID
– Same Day Voting
– Paper Ballots

Democrat cheating stops… Game over!

— Gunther Eagleman (@GuntherEagleman) November 6, 2025

Democrats screech endlessly about imaginary threats to democracy, yet there is zero chance they would refrain from filibustering the commonsense requirements of proof of citizenship, voter ID, same day voting, and paper ballots. Consequently, the filibuster will need to be lifted to defend against election tampering — but:

Once these reforms are enshrined in law, we immediately reinstate the filibuster in full, restoring its protective role. …

[This] sets a precedent for “emergency overrides” in Senate rules, applicable only to existential threats like fraud that undermine democracy itself. Plus, by codifying the temporary nature—perhaps with a built-in sunset clause or explicit bill language—we build public trust, showing Republicans are committed to good governance, not power grabs.

The effect could be saving the nation from the fate of New York.

As [Democrats] spiral deeper into Marxist ideologies, their survival hinges on voter fraud—ballot harvesting, machine glitches, fake votes from illegal immigrants, and corrupted mail-in schemes. With these reforms in place, that lifeline vanishes.

Curtailing election fraud could end the Democratic Party as we know it. To survive, the party would have to answer to the American people.

The challenge is to lock in breaking the filibuster as a once in a lifetime event. The alternative to trying is to wait for radicalized Democrats to take power — knowing they will break the filibuster anyway so as to pack the Supreme Court and consolidate control. That will allow them to render future elections futile with fraud-facilitating legislation like the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act.

The post What to Break the Filibuster For: The Whatfinger Compromise appeared first on Moonbattery.