Two Muslim Soldiers in British Army Discharged for Sharing Hamas Atrocity Videos

Want to see videos of women tied by barbed wire to their daughters, and then both of them raped, before being killed? Want to see decapitated Jewish babies? How about whole families burned to death? Or women whose breasts were sliced off, or men with their eyes gouged out and genitalia cut off? There’s all this, and more, and apparently two Muslims in the British army were delighted to view such atrocities — not to deplore, but to take delight in them. Now their ghoulish interest has been found out, and as a result, they have both been discharged from the army.

More on these Muslim admirers of rape, torture, mutilation, and murder of Jews can be found here.

Two British army soldiers have been dismissed for sending and sharing footage of Hamas murdering and desecrating bodies on October 7, 2023, according to a transcript from a July 4 Bulford Military Court Martial obtained by the Jerusalem Post on Tuesday.

Signaller Zakariya Munir (22) and Signaller Mohammed Salah (34) of the 10th Signal Regiment were sentenced for offences contrary to section 127 of the Communications Act 2003, which, despite mitigating circumstances, led to the ultimate dismissal.

According to the presiding judge, the offences were committed on or in the month that followed October 8, 2023.

On October 7 itself – the date of the Hamas attack on Israel – the two shared messages that the judge found were not sinister. However, on the following day, October 8, Signaller Munir contacted Signaller Salah, saying he had a video of the attack that “they won’t show in the news.”

Signaller Munir then sent Signaller Salah a “headcam footage of faces and bodies of corpses of soldiers being searched for ammunition and bodies being kicked.”

According to the transcript, Signaller Salah then sent footage to other people, including a number of service personnel, via WhatsApp, later that month.

It goes without saying, that the others to whom Salah sent footage, and whom he knew would also take pleasure from the atrocities it showed, were Muslims, too.

Later in the evening of October 8, Signaller Munir asked Signaller Salah if he wanted to see another video, which he referred to as “a bit graphic,” to which Signaller Salah replied, “Yes”.

This footage depicted large numbers of dead people who appeared to be “civilians or unarmed people, lying in pools of blood, and it is quite apparent that they had been killed recently.

Again, sometime during the month that followed, Signaller Salah decided to send this on to other people.

Then on October 16, Signaller Munir sent another video to Signaller Salah, showing a group of young males urinating on, stamping on, and kicking corpses of what looked like older men, whose heads have been bagged and whose hands have been tied. This was then shared by Signaller Salah.

Finally, on October 31, 2023, Signaller Munir sent another video to Signaller Salah showing a number of men kneeling down in front of a number of men with guns, and each man standing behind the kneeling man shot that man in the back of the head, killing him.

Judge says videos were ‘grossly offensive’

The Judge Advocate called it a “deeply shocking video.”

This time, Signaller Salah did not send this video on and actually reported the matter….

What is this? A twinge of conscience on the part of Signaler Salah? Agenbite of inwit? He’d already seen and enjoyed far worse sent to him by Signaler Munir. Or was he perhaps at this point becoming worried that the army might now be following his messages online, both sent and received, so he should now, pretending to be shocked, report this video?

Notably, both men pleaded not guilty.

If they had pled guilty, Signaller Munir may “have a productive military career ahead of you, as suggested by your CO [commanding officer], we have to punish you for what you did.”

Why did Munir’s CO think that someone with Munir’s murderous views could “have a productive military career” ahead of him? He’s a moral monster, reveling in, and then sending onto others, the videos of those Hamas atrocities. He would not become less of a monster by pleading guilty. Whatever he were to plead, he still deserves to be dismissed from the army.

The result: there are now two fewer Hamas sympathizers in the British Army, where Munir and Salah might have caused all kinds of moral mayhem had they not been dismissed. That’s a good result. But an even better result remains to be achieved. That would be for the army to track down all the human links in this ghastly isnad chain, from the Muslims who originally sent Munir the videos, to the Muslims to whom those videos were sent by Munir and Salah. And those who received the videos, and did not report them, whether serving in the army, or the police, or any of the security services, should then also be dismissed.