“LEGAL BOOMERANG”: Hamas-Tied CAIR Forced to Reveal Sources of All Funding (Including Alleged Foreign Sources Tied to Terrorism) After Lawsuit Backfires

In a sea of good news, this ranks top of the list. A former employee of Hamas-tied CAIR alleged they are funded by foreign sources tied to terrorism. They tried to sue her into silence but they dropped their case once they realized they would have to reveal their funding. Now she is suing and a judge has ordered them to open their books.

In a recent legal ruling, Hamas-CAIR will be forced to  “turn over evidence about everything from fundraising practices, such as having raised money from foreign sources and concealed it; whether it deceived donors; whether it mismanaged donor money; whether it retaliated against employees or threatened to retaliate against employees for raising concerns about sexual harassment or the like.”

“The mother of all legal boomerangs.”

Hamas-linked CAIR is Muslim Brotherhood proxy and should be designated a domestic terrorist group engaged in the “Civilization-Jihadist Process.”

Terror-Tied Council of American-Islamic Relations Head Mourns Hamas Terror Leader’s Death

The notorious terror group CAIR is Hamas in America and like Hamas should be designated a terrorist organization. Instead, it is the Democrat’s favorite Islamic group.… pic.twitter.com/3dnzuP2A3D

— Pamela Geller (@PamelaGeller) August 2, 2024

Controversial Muslim group CAIR forced to reveal sources of funding after defamation case against former employee backfires

By Victor Nava, NY Post, Nov. 25, 2024:

The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) will be forced to open its books and reveal its sources of funding after a defamation suit it filed against a former employee completely backfired.

US Magistrate Judge David Schultz ruled Monday that CAIR’s donors, funding sources — potentially including foreign ones — and any assets owned by the group are all within the “scope of permissible discovery” as part of former chapter leader Lori Saroya’s lawsuit against the controversial Muslim rights group.

Saroya filed a federal defamation complaint against CAIR in January after the group dropped its own lawsuit against the former employee, which accused her of embarking on a “defamation campaign” against the organization, including by implying that CAIR is funded by foreign governments and terrorist organizations.

CAIR alleged that Saroya’s statements — posted on social media, in comment sections and emailed to the group’s supporters — damaged the organization’s ability to fundraise and build partnerships, but it ultimately dropped the lawsuit in January 2022 over fears that Saroya’s legal team would “demand the names of CAIR supporters who have donated to us.”

Saroya’s lawyer, Jeffrey Robbins, described Monday’s ruling as “the mother of all legal boomerangs.”

“It’s a very important ruling,” Robbins said of the Minnesota district court judge’s order, in an interview with The Post, noting that the ruling is “very methodical, very careful, very detailed and very analytical.”

Robbins explained that the order will force CAIR to “turn over evidence about everything from fundraising practices, such as having raised money from foreign sources and concealed it; whether it deceived donors; whether it mismanaged donor money; whether it retaliated against employees or threatened to retaliate against employees for raising concerns about sexual harassment or the like.”

The judge noted that “the thrust of CAIR’s allegations against Saroya in the 2021 complaint is that Saroya falsely implied CAIR received funding from foreign governments and terrorists when she stated CAIR accepted ‘international funding through their Washington Trust Foundation.’”

Schultz stated that “CAIR points to no public admission that it received funding from terrorists or that it received funding through the Washington Trust Foundation” but “discovery into these matters is proportionate to the needs of the case.”

“CAIR has not shown that the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, or that it unwarrantedly taxes its resources,” he ruled.

Continued…..