Worse Than We Imagined! Trump Lawyer Exposes Judges Juan Merchan & Arthur Engoron in NYC Cases! - Stephen Gardner

‎***Support BeforeItsNews By Trying HerbAnomic Natural Health Building Products Including Humic & Fulvic Liquid Trace Mineral Complex & UltraCur Bio-Available Curcumin—‎‎Click Here‎‎ For More Information & To Order!***

Stephen Gardner and Trump lawyer Will Scarf https://x.com/willscharf discuss the Trump NYC cases, the sentencing date change, the supreme court and more.

- **Introduction**: Will Scharf, a lawyer for Trump in the New York case against DA Alvin Bragg, discusses recent developments and their implications.

- **Judge Juan Merchan’s Recent Decision**:
  – Judge Juan Merchan called for Trump’s sentencing to be moved to mid-September.
  – Scharf explains how this decision came about and discusses whether it’s advantageous or detrimental for Trump.
  – He highlights the strategic considerations behind the timing of the sentencing.

- **Motivations Behind the Legal Actions Against Trump**:
  – Scharf shares his perspective on whether the goal is to arrest Trump or to tarnish his image without crossing the line of jailing him.
  – He emphasizes the political motivations and the potential consequences of different legal outcomes.

- **Supreme Court and Trump**:
  – Discussion on how Democrats portray the conservative justices on the Supreme Court as colluding with Trump.
  – Scharf argues that the justices clarified the laws for all presidents, not just Trump.
  – He delves into the complexities of Supreme Court rulings and addresses the misconception that the justices are delaying decisions in favor of Trump.

- **Bias and Perception of Judges**:
  – Scharf discusses the double standards in how Democrats view different judges.
  – He explains why Judge Arthur Engoron and Judge Juan Merchan are seen as unbiased and righteous by Democrats, while Judge Aileen Cannon is demonized.
  – The conversation touches on the broader implications of judicial bias and political motivations.

- **Call for Biden’s Cognitive Testing**:
  – Scharf comments on CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta’s, suggestion that Joe Biden should undergo detailed cognitive testing following his debate performance.
  – He discusses the potential impact of such testing on Biden’s political standing and public perception.

- **First Black Woman President Mention**:
  – Brief mention of the historic significance of having the first black woman serve as president, though not directly related to the legal discussions.

- **Closing Remarks**: Scharf concludes by summarizing the key points discussed, emphasizing the importance of understanding the legal and political nuances in the cases against Trump.

**Detailed Points**:

1. **Judge Juan Merchan’s Decision**:
   - The timing of Trump’s sentencing is critical, potentially impacting his political strategies and public perception.
   - Scharf analyzes the legal reasoning and strategic implications of moving the sentencing to mid-September.

2. **Arrest vs. Image Destruction**:
   - Scharf argues that the aim might be to leave Trump with a destroyed image rather than arresting him, as jailing a former president could be seen as crossing a line.
   - He explores the political calculations behind the legal actions and their potential impact on Trump’s future.

3. **Supreme Court’s Role**:
   - The Supreme Court’s rulings have broader implications for presidential powers and legal clarifications.
   - Scharf discusses the perception of the Supreme Court’s conservative justices and their rulings related to Trump.
   - He addresses the narrative that the justices are either delaying or rushing decisions based on political motivations.

4. **Judicial Bias and Political Perceptions**:
   - The contrasting perceptions of judges like Engoron, Merchan, and Cannon highlight the political bias in the judicial system.
   - Scharf emphasizes the importance of unbiased judicial proceedings and the impact of political narratives on public trust in the judiciary.

5. **Biden’s Cognitive Testing**:
   - The suggestion for Biden’s cognitive testing brings up questions about his mental fitness and ability to lead.
   - Scharf discusses the potential implications for Biden’s presidency and the upcoming elections.

6. **Historical Context**:
   - The mention of the first black woman president adds a historical context to the discussion, highlighting significant milestones in political representation.

7. **Conclusion**:
   - Scharf’s insights provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal and political landscape surrounding Trump’s cases.
   - He underscores the importance of critical analysis and awareness of the broader implications of these legal proceedings.