Paper Shows Vaccines Could Potentially Damage Your Body For Many Months Post Vaccination

Dr. Mobeen Syed (Dr. Been) is a pretty well known and well regarded doctor who has been covering the COVID pandemic on his YouTube channel for a while now. He gives great presentations using artwork he draws himself to demonstrate scientific concepts to the laymen. I’ve learned a lot from him.

During an interview yesterday, Dr. Been let it be known that his wife developed Bell’s Palsy after vaccination. His 23 year old niece also had issues functioning after vaccination. Dr. Been ended up turning to Dr. Bruce Patterson’s team, who helped create a treatment protocol for them. Dr. Been’s wife is now 99% better thanks to Dr. Patterson’s treatment protocol.

The interview is fairly technical, but they cover some very important topics I want to discuss further.

The discussion centered around a recently published paper by Dr. Patterson entitled, “Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months Post-Infection.”

I think this paper is going to be a real Earth shaker. Frankly, I’m surprised it hasn’t been censored yet.

Basically the paper is saying that a protein on the surface of the SARS-CoV-2 virus that causes COVID, called spike protein S1, is a toxin. It can cause all sorts of damage on its own, independent from the body of the virus.

The COVID vaccines cause your body’s own cells to produce the very same spike protein the virus has, so based on the papers findings, it logically follows that the vaccines are injecting a toxin into your body. Even though the paper makes no mention of vaccines, it clearly demonstrates that the vaccines are toxic.

Researchers were aware the S1 spike protein was potentially dangerous over a year ago when this paper titled, “SARS-CoV-2 spike protein S1 subunit induces pro-inflammatory responses via toll-like receptor 4 signaling in murine and human macrophages“, was making the rounds. When you see the word inflammation, think damage. Several other papers found the same thing, see here, here, here, here, and here.

What makes the Patterson paper so special is that it proves that this inflammation causing spike protein can persist in the body and cause continuous damage for over a year post-infection, and it explains the exact mechanisms by which this occurs. Other papers showing the spike protein can cause damage weren’t given much consideration since it was assumed the body quickly got rid of the protein.

The mechanism described in the paper by which the spike protein sticks around works like this: In some people, the spike protein can get absorbed by white blood cells (monocytes) that fight infection. These white blood cells can then go on to transform themselves into something called non-classical monocytes that end up living far longer than a normal white blood cell, and because they have this spike protein in them, they can end up causing inflammation in all sorts of tissues throughout your body, particularly in the lining of your blood vessels.

Inflammation resulting from these non-classical monocytes is what is responsible for long haul COVID symptoms (symptoms lasting months or years), and it can lead to all sorts of vascular damage or other issues, such as neurological conditions. It’s known that exercise can activate the release of some of these monocytes, which can result in flare ups of long COVID.

In summary, the paper shows:

• Clear toxicity of the virus/vaccine induced spike protein.

• A clear mechanism of long COVID.

• A clear mechanism of vaccine induced long COVID.

• A clear mechanism of vaccine injury that explains the extremely wide range of pathologies involved.

• Why we see so many vascular related issues with COVID and the vaccines.

Dr. Patterson states in the interview that he has a few more papers coming out in the next week or two, so I’ll be sure to keep an eye out for those as well.

That said, I’m not at all happy with some of what was said during this interview. All three of them are pushing the vaccines. I find it unconscionable that doctors would be telling people to take a vaccine that they KNOW contains a toxin that could potentially cause debilitating illness or death.

I have to assume they are pushing these clot shots because they feel like the risk from the vaccines is far lower than the risk from COVID, but this is a false dichotomy created by either their fear of speaking about early treatment options or their ignorance of them.

To quote my letter to the Senate, “Currently there are 52 peer reviewed studies, with several more undergoing review, virtually all showing ivermectin to be highly effective at treating COVID-19.  These published peer-reviewed studies encompass 18,768 patients, authored by over 538 scientists.  There are a total of 73 published studies on ivermectin as it relates to the treatment of COVID-19 patients, encompassing 56,774 patients and 691 authors.  There is evidence of a negative publication bias, and the probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 73 studies is estimated to be 1 in 619 billion [10]. “

Rather than telling people to take a clot shot with a known toxin, which gives limited immunity, they could be telling people to just wait until they are symptomatic and take some ivermectin, or even better, follow the FLCCC protocols for early treatment. This way people can get the benefits of natural immunity without exposing themselves to an experimental toxic brew.

So yeah.

Suddenly Pfizer writing off the elevated all cause mortality in their vaccine cohort compared to the control group as being unrelated to the vaccine just got a lot more questionable.

No wonder they just asked a judge to keep their data sealed for 75 years.

posted from Michael’s Substack