Utah Mom’s Case Could Break Through Immunity Wall Surrounding Vaccine Makers

The legislation that protects pharmaceutical companies that produce what they refer to as “vaccines” is unconstitutional.  We are supposed to apply the law to everyone equally.  Sadly, Big Pharma has been shielded from those in DC who pimp their sorceries and take their money while millions die and many millions more are injured.  However, a Utah mother’s case could break through the “legal” wall that has protected these murderers for decades in the US.

2KUTV has the story of Brianne Dressen, a mother who is vaccine-injured and her story is not uncommon.

SALT LAKE CITY (KUTV) — A Utah woman is part of a first-of-its-kind lawsuit against an industry that has been given rare immunity regardless of any mistakes it makes.

• Buy All-American!
• Bring health and vitality back to your body with these non-transdermal patches
• Get your Vitamin B17 & Get 10% Off With Promo Code TIM
• How To Protect Yourself From 5G, EMF & RF Radiation
• The Very Best All-American Made Supplements On The Maret
• Grab This Bucket Of Heirloom Seeds & Save with Promo Code TIM
• Here’s A Way You Can Stockpile Food For The Future
• Stockpile Your Ammo & Save $15 On Your First Order
• Preparing Also Means Detoxifying – Here’s One Simple Way To Detoxify
• The Very Best Chlorine Dioxide
• All-American, US Prime, High Choice Grass-Fed Beef with NO mRNA, hormones or antibiotics… ever!

…

“I feel like I’m being electrocuted from head to toe,” said Brianne Dressen in describing what is her constant experience.

While she is now in pain and unable to do much each day, she said a few years seems a lifetime ago.

She was an active mom who spent winters snowboarding on Utah’s mountains and summers rock-climbing.

As the COVID pandemic raged in 2020, she felt a chance to be part of a clinical trial for a COVID vaccine was an opportunity and a duty.

“I wanted to teach my children, just because things get hard that doesn’t mean we need to crumble,” Dressen said.

Almost immediately she said she felt disturbing symptoms.

“Within an hour my reaction started. It started with pins and needles down the same arm as my injection,” she said.

It quickly progressed.

“Some days it’s a 10 out of 10 on pain and I can’t even think straight. Some days it’s a 4 or a 5,” Dressen said.

With local doctors unsure of what was happening, she went to the National Institutes of Health where she was diagnosed with Post Vaccine Neuropathy.

Courtesy Brianne Dressen

Doctors said tests showed nerves across her body slowly withering and dying.

For most who have been potentially hurt by a medication, their recourse would be the courts — but during the pandemic Congress passed something called the PREP Act.

“The federal government issued a declaration granting immunity to vaccine manufacturers,” said University of Utah Law Professor Daniel Aaron.

The summary of the PREP acts spells out that it “provides liability immunity for activities related to medical countermeasures against COVID-19.”

It essentially banned almost all lawsuits for those who claim they were harmed.

“You’re the one person who’s been harmed by a pharmaceutical product in the one way, in the one way in the United States that you can’t hold anyone accountable,” Dressen said.

Her case is more unique in that she said as part of the clinical trial, she signed a document where Astra Zeneca promised it would pay the cost of medical treatment for any injuries caused by the testing.

Dressen’s attorneys believed it was a contract that would allow this lawsuit when any other would be stopped.

“She relied on those promises in participating in the trial and when she was seriously injured, they were nowhere to be found,” said attorney Aaron Siri.

Dressen said the process has been devastating for her family.

“We had to refinance our house, we had to hire a nanny. We were sunk really fast,” she said.

The effects have been personal as well.

“As a mom you don’t want to be a burden to your family. You don’t want to be the sinking ship. You’re supposed to be the anchor actually that keeps it all together,” Dressen said.

Courtesy Brianne Dressen

Her attorneys argued the protection Congress gave to a specific industry puts many more people at risk.

“Why are cars safer? Because they know they’ll be sued if they cause a problem. But when you remove the liability, you’ve taken away the main way, the primary way, that product safety is ensured,” Siri said.

Others have argued it’s well worth the cost, and that without these legal protections vaccine development would have taken much longer, or perhaps they would not have been developed at all.

“Vaccines are not always the most profitable kind of biomedical product to produce, and yet they’re very, very important to keep our society functioning,” Prof. Aaron said.

It’s still an open question of whether, despite any promises made, a judge could still throw out the case.

“What’s challenging here is that the PREP Act has pretty broad sweeping language that would seem to block even this kind of lawsuit, but if that’s the case this company could promise something and then not deliver any compensation at all,” Aaron said.

If a judge does allow the case to go forward, Aaron said he could see this case going all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Article posted with permission from Sons of Liberty Media