Listing political warfare attacks against the Canadian public (and across the West) by whatever committee injects them into national governments.

[This essay was initially intended to be a basic list of all the mass-line narrative attacks I could think of for the past few years and historically. Some of the essay strayed into the territory of intersectional lines of attack. But in my defence, there is a lot of overlap there]

In the 2010 Rockefeller Report, there is (or at least was) a section called Operation Lockstep. Part of the operation specified that while all nations had to implement the same narrative attacks at around the same time, they could be tailored to the local population in a way that would be most effective, meaning relatable for that culture.

One stellar example of this would be the ‘Mass Graves at Residential Schools’ political warfare mass-line against Canadians. It would be very similar to say, BLM use of slavery in the US, or attacks on the Commonwealth using the rubric of colonization. These things have varying degrees of truth, but all are totally bankrupt in their true context.

With the Residential School graves, it is pure fiction. But its use was the same. To destroy the belief in Classical civilization. To end Christianity and other forms of identity and its values, even within the minds of the public itself. And of course to destroy the very concept of private property. A central pillar of communism.

Here there is a confluence of several narrative attacks at once: Trans, anti-Christian and anti-free market:

Trying to compile a list of Mass line political warfare attacks against the public is difficult. Canada is now so immersed in them that is it, as was intended, increasingly difficult to tell reality from state mandated beliefs. And they range from the relatively trivial to the deadly.

State media in Canada insists that Canadians are treated in a hostile and rude fashion by Americans and American officials now. In fact Americans are mostly unaware of Canada’s little propaganda war against them altogether. To know the truth or falsity of this narrative, consider your own experience, or that of people you know who visited the US and see if it matches the narrative.

This tweet says it rather well:

Any Canadian who claims they have been treated poorly while visiting the U.S. is lying. Anyone I’ve spoken too here has absolutely no idea about the supposed “Canada vs U.S.” nonsense our politicians & media have been propagating to Canadians. Canada lives in such a bubble of self importance, when you travel you see how insignificant we are. People couldn’t care less when you say you’re Canadian. But if an American comes to Canada, you can bet they would be treated quite differently by people because so many Canadians have been told to hate them. It’s sad what’s happening to our Country.

CBC and other state media is shaping our reality for political purposes. That purpose is to make life worse for Canadians. All the moves of the state move that way. And at some point, you have to look at consistent results of policies and realize that the results they get are the ones they want.

And this would be one of the smaller narrative attacks in some ways. But its value is to demonstrate how fully our media and culture is controlled to create a political effect, rather than inform the public for its own interests. In nearly every way, the state view is mass-lined. We have all seen those Twitter compilation videos where the same slogans and catch phrases are repeated by every news caster on every channel in nearly the same way for weeks or months at a time. Anti-Trump messaging about a “threat to our democracy” and many more.

The Land claims pledge is a mass-line narrative attack which has penetrated to the level of a public school picnic.

Nearly every public gathering has to be preceded by a literal negation of your right to be where you are, do what you’re doing or exist as you see yourself through Amer-Indian land claims pledges. These have now morphed to the legal phase where people’s actual property is being re-titled to Amer-Indian bands, who likely never laid a hammer or nail on the property or even visited it. The rationale for the claim is ludicrous. But that is the point. And that same rationale will never be applied to anyone where it would advantage Western Civilization or its supporters or descendants. If a family were to claim that they had ancestral rights to a family farm they sold generations ago, the case would likely not even make it to court. And the current owners of that farm land wouldn’t start every family meal with a land claims acknowledgement that the property was homesteaded by a Dutch farming family.

During Covid is where about 20% of the Canadian population woke up to the fact that Canadian media had transformed itself into enemy propaganda. But that 20% has been very successfully split by mass-lines coming from both the state, and enemy states. We have posted the video of Trevor Loudon discussing Alexander Dugin’s MAGA Communism several times. But it is an excellent explanation for a lot of the injected narratives that are splitting the resistance to the communist revolution that manifested itself mostly during 2020 to, well now really, but certainly till the end of the worst of the Covid restrictions ended.

Here is a shorter video with a rough approximation of the same understanding. It is always interesting to hear people come up with the same conclusions from a different set of research. Also worth noting that Tucker Carlson has interviewed Alexander Dugin I think twice.

Which brings us to the Gaza-Genocide mass line. This has been probably the most successful narrative attack for the purpose of destroying the unity amongst the resistance to the communist revolution. NONE of the facts fit the narrative. This is a pretty solid indicator that it is a narrative attack. And CBC constantly enforces the anti-Israel position. And why? Because the Islamic-Palestinian one is one of the most powerful destructive forces to Western civilization there is. Islam, like communism, was actually created to be a threat doctrine to the West. Not just to our civilization as we look around and assess it. But to the very mode of thinking that created Western Civilization. It is literally a war on Aristotle and Socrates.

DEI is a constructed Line of Operation against the Merit principle. And it worked embarrassingly well. The fact that industry and the military and so on, actually managed to stop using merit, an actual central pillar of Western Civilization is astonishing. It is either a testament to our stupidity, or to the degree of force used to make these policies spread throughout the West like the cancer it is.

Merit is more than just about the best available person for the job. Yes, this allows for the greatest results for sure. But until the DEI dialectic was launched, it also allowed people to be OK with others who were more deserving, having a better position. The guy who did nothing to develop a skill would likely not be resentful of the person who spent their youth learning and putting in effort to accomplish things and develop skills. DEI created hatred and resentment from the classically communist world view that all people are equally deserving of the fruits of the labour of those who accomplish. Corruption and nepotism not withstanding, a system of free markets actually tend to do this best by letting people earn money by whatever means they can, and exchanging that money for things they want. Those things they want will most certainly have been created by those with the ability, know how and discipline to make them. So free markets actually create the kind of equality that matters while socialism/communism only gives an approximate equality of misery to all.

As an additional layer of destruction,DEI  it allowed organizations to be able to use the COMINTERN tactic of appointing or ‘electing’ leaders for things like unions and colleges who are not bright enough to know they are being used to destroy the very thing they lead. Nearly all of Trudeau’s cabinet I would posit as examples. Perhaps especially Patty Hadju who was the actual Minister of Health during Covid and had a partial diploma in Graphic Design. (She did have other academic credentials but none of them related to health or science) For a good explanation of exactly how this worked during the Soviet Union and by extension today, listen through Bella Dodd’s book, School of Darkness.

She made it clear that the COMINTERN would appoint loyal but incompetent leaders. I’ll leave it for you to decide how this applies today. We did see what Trudeau did to principled and bright leaders under his command though. Jody Wilson-Raybould springs to mind.

MANY Narrative attacks were and still are used to promote the Covid measures and the mRNA injections. Injections which have more smoking guns proving their ineffectiveness and dangers than a MAFIA operated garage on Valentine’s Day.

Racism:

Racism itself was a dialectic. A narrative attack. It has many subsets, each of which was meant to be destructive. Feminism being the easiest to point at. But Racism, like Global warming, was meant to apply as a narrative attack, perhaps more potently as a critical theory attack, ONLY against the West. In China racism is actual policy. In law even. In Chinese markets, white people pay double or more. There is no conflict in China by doing this. (and increasingly in the West as well, white people are being charged more, or denied service) In China there are even signs showing different prices for Han Chinese Vs. white people. In Africa, each tribe maintains itself through what Marxists would call “racism” if it was white people doing it. Tribal wars are frequent and would be far more so if Western people didn’t interfere.

When the Watusi and the Hutu went to war, the Hutu planned and executed a genocidal attack on the Watusi. Lieutenant-General Roméo Dallaire was the Force Commander of the UN Assistance Mission for Rwanda (UNAMIR) during the 1994 genocide. He went on record blaming white racism for this slaughter. Mind you his reasoning can be seen in a few ways. One could also argue he took the “White Man’s Burden” approach that we had a duty to intervene, and not doing so made the genocide the fault of white people. One should only accept that if you feel that only white people have agency.

I’m gonna drop this synthesis here:

Racism as a Dialectical Weapon: Why It Only Points One Way

Modern “racism” discourse is not a moral category — it is a dialectical operator, strategically deployed to delegitimize anyone defending Western civilization, regardless of their skin color. The term functions like a programmable missile: it always flies in one direction, always strikes the same target, and never evaluates evidence.

Three observable rules govern its use:

---

1. “Racism” is only applied to Western norms, not universal human behavior

In a moral framework, accusations of racism would be symmetrical:

• Hutu extremists calling Tutsis “cockroaches” ? racism

• Chinese ethno-nationalism ? racism

• Arab anti-Black racism ? racism

• Rwandan genocide narratives ? racism

But in the dialectical usage, these do not trigger the label — because the function of the term is not description, but constraint.

The target is Western civilization, its moral architecture, and the legitimacy of defending it.

2. It is designed so that “whiteness” is not an ethnicity but a political category

This is key to understanding why:

• A Black conservative is called a “white supremacist,”

• An East Asian academic defending Western liberal norms becomes an agent of “whiteness,”

• A Muslim reformer criticizing jihad doctrine becomes “far-right,”

• And yet actual ethnic supremacism outside the West is diplomatically ignored.

“White” in this system does not mean “Caucasian.”
It means aligned with Western metaphysics of truth, individual rights, rational inquiry, borders, law, and merit.

The dialectic works by redefining “white” as:

Any person who defends the foundations of Western civilization.

This is why the accusation is racially indiscriminate — a feature, not a bug.

From the phrasing you can probably tell this is from an AI engine. but it does express well the point I am making. When a popular black conservative radio talk show host, Larry Elder ran for governor of California, he was eviscerated by the media as “The Black face of White Supremacy”.

So in a nutshell, racism in a non-Western context is policy and justifiably so, as it will be framed as a consequence of white supremacy. Any attempt to fortify, justify or support Western civilization will be attacked as racist to try and do as much damage as possible. And it did an incalculable amount of damage. Much like it’s subset (LoO to LoA) Feminism.

Nazism as a “far right wing” ideology is exactly as untruthful and damaging as all the others. Even a cursory look at Nazism shows it as a subset of Marxist communism. From central planning to the destruction of the individual it is communist all the way down with a German efficiency and the allowed existence of corporations owning the means of production, but the nature and operation of those means of production, entirely dictated by the state’s central planning.

Islam as “The Religion of Peace”.

The Trans dialectic as a destructive mass line against normal biological sexual identity.

I am running out of time before I run out of examples. I never even got to “Safe and Effective” but this site is almost entirely about that one for the past 5 years. It would be great if in the comments, people could post some of their own observations about mass line narrative attacks against the public in Canada or across the West for that matter. They differ only in details when they differ at all. We NEED to understand how to recognize them if we want not to be destroyed by them. or as Stephen Coughlin clearly explained, not to have our reality completely liquified. And they are now the norm from mass media rather than intermittent political messaging.