King Charles’ speech to open Parliament

I’m afraid I hadn’t bothered to listen to this. I knew it would be tedious and discouraging, given that Carney, who brought this officious commie WEFfer to Canada and Charles himself are both main drivers of the revolution that is obliterating the most fundamental of human rights. But after filming Bath-Shéba van den Berg last night, speaking publicly on the state of the law, and the Helen Grus hearings as well as many who were charged with “mischief” or had their bank accounts frozen, sometimes for months for being adjacent to those who participated in the Freedom Convoy, I felt I had to. She mentioned in an en-passant remark that Charles had mentioned something about sweeping legislative changes to come in Canada.

Initially the plan was to clip out the best (worst) parts of this speech and post a compilation of them, but after watching, so far about 65% of it, I thought that frankly everyone should probably see it.

It is a mixture of some bizarre kind of leftist jingoism, an attempt to unify Canadians by opposing them all to Donald Trump’s America, excited noises about joining European military efforts, whatever-that-may-mean, also noises about increased military cooperation with the US somehow, a LOT about the removal of gun rights from Canadians, I guess except the ones going to fight in Europe’s wars or something? I dunno. Charles opens with a land claims acknowledgement. The King of England opens his speech with an explanation of how the land the British and French settled, really all belongs to tribes no one can pronounce.

This of course is amusing on the surface. But the likely real purpose of the land claims BS is to disenfranchise Canadians that they have any title to the Canada which they and their ancestors built, and who’s laws reflect their culture and history, such that they have no reasonable grounds to oppose the total replacement of Canadians with Africans and Muslims. And African Muslims. In other words, the land claims BS is a dialectic attack on Canadian identity.

So here it is. I would watch it with far more attention and awareness than you want to. It is every bit as tedious as you imagined it would be. But probably a lot more dangerous.

The truly funny bit though is around the middle, where he fumbles through a book of notes as he reads Trudeau/Carney talking points as if there was a bad smell on the page. I mean it’s right out of the Liberal Campaign book.

This doesn’t make Charles a Liberal party supporter anymore than the CBC is.

Like the CBC and the Liberal party, King Charles is an agent of the revolution. And like the CBC, should the Liberal Party or its Cabinet or its leadership stop serving the interests of the COMINTERN, they will be replaced.

So here it is.

Please leave comments with any observations you may have. This is simply not as trivial as we want it to be.

Anyone know what happened to King Charles the 1st? And why? I wonder if he does.