Why it is critical to understand that it is NOT Hypocrisy, but dialectics and what that means with examples

Hopefully this will shed light on two terms that tend to make most of us controlled opposition. Looking at certain events and calling them “hypocrisy” and-or “corruption”.

The distinction matters because both terms are always about an abuse of a process or system that depend on the system to work. In other words, if the MAFIA couldn’t count on the rest of civilization to operate along a consistent set of rules, it could not profit by cheating and gaming those rules. Even the mob needs to know their ill gotten wealth is safe in the banks. So 5they don’t want to destroy the banks or the whole banking system. (We leave that to the EU and Mark Carney and other dialectical engineers and organizations planning to substitute actual money with CBDC.)

Hypocrisy is similar in that a person gains advantage by telling people to operate by modus A while themselves operating under Modus -A, the exact terms they instructed others, not to behave. Members of the PTL club spring to mind if anyone remembers those amusing scandals.

But they do not wish to take down the system, and although enough corruption and hypocrisy will take down the system, that is not the intention.

What we see with Islam and the left is precisely the use of what appears to be hypocrisy and corruption specifically and mainly to totally destroy Western civilization and all it’s governing principles, right down to even, any remembrance of them. What George Orwell referred to as, “The Memory Hole”. And in another term which needs careful analysis, Ontario and other school boards at one point banned the book, 1984. Now we could ask, was this irony? Or was this dialectics.

Below, Muslims in Montreal issues a veiled death threat to someone filming a public display of Islamic “prayer” on the open streets of downtown Montreal. This is proof that like most leftist actions, they are provocations disguised as piety, or “environmental activism” when it has little to nothing to do with either. It is intended to provoke a reaction from the rest of us, and then justify a violent response to the reaction, or criminalize the reaction to their provocation while ignoring the initial provocation by claiming to accept its false premise.

Leftists attacking anything Tesla is such a wonderful example I would like to write them a thank you note. They are attacking what they themselves claim is a solution to a problem, (itself a dialectic as Global Warming from human produced CO2 is just not a thing) because the man who owns the company facilitates freedom of speech and is currently undoing one of the three Cloward-Piven strategies, specifically growing the civil service as much as possible for the prime purpose of oppressing the public.

So when these kinds of events happen, they are a dialectic, because they are lines of action, or more simply, direct actions for the purpose of destroying our systems, and not hypocrisy or corruption which depend on the systems to be intact for any benefit to the individual hypocrite or corrupt actors.

??Jihadi alert ??

Another display of Islamist intimidation, via public prostrations, in the streets of Montréal, Québec.

Masked Islamist threatens me, “Lord have mercy on your soul because we won’t.”

When is enough, enough Canada? ? pic.twitter.com/UyEjcGsptg

— Natasha Montreal Live Free or Die (@NatashaMontreal) March 20, 2025

A couple more examples of precisely this:

https://t.co/0whc7dRZi1

— Dacey Media (@chrisdacey) March 19, 2025

Climate activists vandalize Tesla because todays left is made up of a bunch moronic terrorists. Sorry. Not sorry. pic.twitter.com/VKCX0wioN6

— Insurrection Barbie (@DefiyantlyFree) March 20, 2025

It should be noted that reporting incidents like this as hypocrisy, Irony, or corruption is in fact playing into enemy hands. Failure to understand the enemy’s goal, is failure to defend the thing being attacked.