How We Got Here: Moral Flexibility Leads to Moral Decay

Oftwominds.com‘s eclectic range of timely topics include finance, economy, stocks, housing, Asia, energy, long-term trends, social issues, urban planning, work/tradecraft, health/diet/fitness, sustainability, Les Paul guitars and The Great Transformation ahead: www.oftwominds.com/blog.html.

Moral flexibility accumulates. Over time, it leaves you compromised.

This is a guest essay by correspondent 0bserver. This series focuses on the realities of self-employment. In my view, everyone is self-employed to some degree now, whether they’re aware of it or not.

At some point, I learned to draw a line. I do not do business with people who publicly signal virtue while treating their employees poorly. I do not care what their politics are. I do not care what causes they promote. If the public posture and the private behavior do not match, I am not interested.

That decision costs money. I accept that.

I have already been down the other path.

What I eventually realized is that this is not about strategy, branding, or long-term thinking. It is about an internal moral line. A point where you stop asking whether something is legal, profitable, or defensible, and ask whether you should be involved at all.

Once that line is crossed, everything else becomes negotiable. Saying yes becomes easier. Saying no starts to feel naive. The damage does not happen all at once. It happens incrementally, as each compromise makes the next one feel smaller. That is the line I am not willing to cross.

For a long time, I worked inside systems where absorbing other people’s bad behavior was treated as normal. Complaints became leverage. Entitlement was reframed as customer service. You were expected to endure it quietly and keep things moving.

It leaves a residue.

You feel it before you can fully articulate it, a physical sense that something is off. Over time, you learn to override that signal. You tell yourself it is temporary. That it is necessary. That this is simply how business works.

It is not.

This is how moral flexibility becomes routine.

When you are responsible for your own business, the excuses disappear. If a customer has a legitimate issue, it is your responsibility to make it right. That is not weakness. That is ownership. But when someone continues to complain after a good-faith attempt at repair, clarity matters. The relationship ends, not out of anger, but out of orientation.

Boundaries are not punishment. They are information. I do not do business with people I do not respect. Craft matters as well. If the work itself lacks integrity, that matters.

What matters most is how people use power. Insecurity in employees is human. Abuse from owners is not. When someone humiliates staff, yells, or treats people as disposable, it is not a management style. It is a signal. Whatever someone is willing to do to those beneath them, they will eventually do to those beside them.

You inherit the moral residue of the people you choose to work with. The right way, for me, is simple: providing a service to qualified customers.

If I have to explain what the product is or why it matters, we are misaligned. If the interest is vague, performative, or rooted in signaling rather than use, we are misaligned.

I am not here to convince people. I am here to serve people who already know what they want and value it.

That disqualifies many potential customers. That is intentional.

At a certain scale, people stop being real. Names blur. Context drops out. Consequences diffuse. When that happens, behavior becomes easier to justify because no one feels present anymore.

Shrinking the circle fixes this.

When you deal with a small number of real people, people you recognize and whose reputations actually travel, abstraction disappears. Actions carry weight. There is no place to hide behind process or posture. The lights are on.

This does not mean avoiding growth. It means avoiding the kind of growth that requires moral distance. I will scale within the boundary, not beyond it.

People will say this approach is limiting. That it slows growth. That it leaves money on the table.

That is true.

I traded comfort for this deliberately. If I am going to struggle on my own, I want to know I did it the right way. If I wanted the opposite, I could take a job and make more money.

I chose discomfort because it was the only way to remain antifragile and survive market shifts.

Integrity is not something I perform. It is practical.

Integrity means I can look in the mirror without lying to myself.

Moral flexibility accumulates. Over time, it leaves you compromised.

My new book Investing In Revolution is available at a 10% discount ($18 for the paperback, $24 for the hardcover and $8.95 for the ebook edition). Introduction (free)

Check out my updated Books and Films.

Become a $3/month patron of my work via patreon.com

Subscribe to my Substack for free

---

NOTE: Contributions/subscriptions are acknowledged in the order received. Your name and email remain confidential and will not be given to any other individual, company or agency.

Thank you, Horus Cocu ($70), for your marvelously generous subscription to this site — I am greatly honored by your support and readership.		Thank you, Louis F. ($7/month), for your magnificently generous subscription to this site — I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Thank you, David B. ($70) for your superbly generous subscription to this site — I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Thank you, BF ($7/month) for your splendidly generous subscription to this site — I am greatly honored by your support and readership.

Source: http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2026/02/how-we-got-here-moral-flexibility-leads.html