Apocalypto + Jewish Racism Against Africans

Epstein emails revealed he hunted African Americans at night at thier Island for fun!

Thrilling hunt …
Ariane de Rothschild
Going to mean Lana’s party now to hunt:)

→ Epstein Emails has them saying “Thanks… thrilling hunt”and “Guess what? They’re N****rs” pic.twitter.com/JcTkv4n6hi

— DG🎭 (@DanielGilr44222) February 13, 2026

One of the most disturbing revelations of the Epstein files is the elite engaging in human hunting parties. And they’re not hunting athletes or people who can defend themselves, but the most vulnerable members of society—children, the homeless, mentally disabled, young girls, minorities. So it’s not really a hunt but straight up murder.

Mel Gibson’s Apocalypto showed that towards the end of the Aztec empire they were up to the same sort of thing, hunting humans in the forest and taking scalps for trophies. But at least they did it openly and for their gods. Our evil elites are hunting innocent souls in secret like the cowards that they are. 

In this specific email Epstein said they’re hunting black people. And in numerous other emails his racism shows through.

I don’t know what they teach in Judaism and the Talmud about Africans, but it’s obviously not good. They probably classify black people even lower than the goy term that they like to throw around so much. These are sick and evil people because their religion makes them so. 

It’s the same with Al-Qaeda terrorists and Islamists in general. They read their little holy book, and it tells them everyone who isn’t a Muslim deserves to die or live as a slave.

In both religions humans are divided between Jew and Gentile, Muslim and Infidel. It’s the same dichotomy. Infidels and Gentiles are viewed as a lower species. 

And this should not be surprising since Islam grew out of the same cultural and religious milieu. It’s Judaism for Arabs basically. Muslims are also very racist towards Africans. 

It must be remembered that Jewish leaders, Muslims, and the Ottoman Empire participated heavily in the African slave trade. 

They’ve been hunting blacks for sport since way before Epstein came along. 

But now that they don’t need slaves for labor they’re just killing them for fun, for a blood rush. That’s how they think. They believe they’re doing God’s work by killing off the excess supply. That’s what Covid was about. 

Trump calls the Epstein leaks “boring stuff.” He couldn’t be more wrong. This is life and death. This is about the future of our species.

II.

Wikipedia – Isaac Abarbanel:

Isaac ben Judah Abarbanel (Hebrew: יצחק בן יהודה אברבנאל;‎ 1437–1508), commonly referred to as Abarbanel (Hebrew: אַבַּרבְּנְאֵל; also spelled Abravanel, Avravanel or Abrabanel), was a Portuguese Jewish statesman, philosopher, Bible commentator, and financier.

. . .Ironically, according to David Brion Davis, a Yale historian who specializes in slavery, Abarbanel played a pivotal role in providing the conceptual basis for black slavery: “[...] the great Jewish philosopher and statesman Isaac ben Abravanel, having seen many black slaves both in his native Portugal and in Spain, merged Aristotle’s theory of natural slaves with the belief that the biblical Noah had cursed and condemned to slavery both his son Ham and his young grandson Canaan. Abravanel concluded that the servitude of animalistic black Africans should be perpetual.” Abarbanel’s view on slavery, however, stood in direct contradiction to that of Rashi, who, citing an earlier Talmudic source, wrote that the heathen were never included in the sanction of possessing slaves as the children of Israel were permitted to do, for the Scripture says (Leviticus 25:44): “Of them you shall buy, etc.”, meaning, “Israel alone is permitted to buy from them [enslaved persons], but they are not permitted to buy [enslaved persons] from you, nor from one another.”

Scholars including Jonathan Schorsch and David M. Goldenberg point out Abarbanel’s comments on the Book of Amos as indicative of very humanistic sentiments: “[Abarbanel] responded with unconcealed anger to the comment of a tenth-century Karaite from Jerusalem, Yefet b. Ali, on the issue of Black [promiscuity]. Yefet had interpreted a biblical verse (Amos 9:7) to refer to Black women as being ‘promiscuous and therefore no one knows who his father is.’ Abarbanel: ‘I don’t know who told Yefet this practice of promiscuity among Black women, which he mentions. But in the country of my birth [Portugal] I have seen many of these people and their women are loyal to their husbands unless they are prisoners and captive to their enemies. They are just like any other people.’” Schorsch argues that concerning Abarbanel’s views about the connection between slavery and the curse of Ham, Abarbanel was influenced by the writings of his contemporaries and predecessors, including Christian and Muslim writers, as well as the culture around him, and was hardly considered unique in his views. Abarbanel’s commentary on Amos 9:7 and other writings, argues Schorsch, show the complexity of Abarbanel’s views of Blacks. “Abarbanel’s conflicting passages regarding Blacks were written at different times and addressed different realms of discourse, the one abstract myth, the other actual living Blacks.” Schorsch shows how contemporary travel books described Ethiopians as barbarians, stealing each other’s children to sell to Muslim foreigners. “Hence, the many statements that Ethiopians engaged in relations… with their siblings or parents. In this view, families, a cultured product, would not have been known to primitives who lived like animals. Yet Abarbanel dismissed all these derogatory notions when defending the behavior of actual Blacks living in Portugal.”