PBS in Philadelphia: Police Expert says We Can't Stop Ghost Guns

In an article by whyy.org, the National Public Radio station quotes retired police officer Randy Sutton, who says banning “Ghost guns” will not stop people from getting them. The reporter added interesting commentary to the quotes by Sutton.

Sutton added that because ghost guns are not regulated, making them go away outright is unrealistic.

Sutton’s words might be interpreted in such a manner. It seems clear Sutton meant the guns would not “go away outright” whether they were banned or not, whether they were regulated or not. Here is a quote from Sutton in the article.

“There’s not a chance in the world we’re going to ban these
weapons. It’s impossible,” Sutton said. “You can make them illegal to
possess. But the techno barn door has already been opened.”

This graphic from the Philadelphia police department is in the article. It shows a declining percentage of privately made firearms in the last two years.

Sutton understands the reality, including the political reality. The technology to make guns without a factory has always existed in the United States, as has the legal right to do so.

Most guns were made in small shops during the revolutionary era. At the time of the ratification of the Bill of Rights, manufacturing was in a period of rapid change. In a few decades, interchangeable parts would become a common technique. The first successful attempt at interchangeable parts for firearms was in France, in 1785. Thomas Jefferson witnessed the successful demonstration. The French Revolution destroyed the workshop where the French demonstration happened, and even the memory of its success.

Thomas Jefferson took the concept to America. The United States pushed for interchangeable parts in its military small arms. In 1824, at Harpers Ferry Armory, the attempt succeeded.

In most cases, firearms continued made by hand, assembled from a collection of basic units, and hand fitted to work, mostly by individual craftsmen, well after the Harpers Ferry success story. Individuals would often purchase a barrel or make one, purchase a stock or make one, then most often purchase a lock, and fit them all together to make them work.

No license was required to do this. The potential of serial numbers were known. They were not required. They were seldom used outside of the military. As making firearms moved into factories, some manufacturers used serial numbers, most did not.

Individuals could always make firearms for themselves. Even relatively complex firearms such as revolvers were and have been made by individuals up to the present. Items such as bombs and grenades were and are much easier to make than firearms.

As precise metal working machines became cheaper and as metal shapes, such as steel tubes became standardized and mass produced, it became easier and easier for individuals to make their own firearms. Firearms are commonly produced in small jungle workshops around the world. They have commonly been produced in the United States by hobbyists. Where people are forbidden from legally obtaining firearms, the number of homemade firearms increases to meet demand. In the United States, in restrictive jurisdictions, the number of homemade firearms has always been higher than where firearms are easily and legally obtained.

 Image of countrymade pistols in India

In the United States, in one of the most highly restricted jurisdictions, the District of Columbia, in 1977, 20% of the guns seized by police were homemade. In 2010, 12% of the firearms in DC and Prince George’s had no serial numbers. As seen in the Philadelphia PD chart, personally made firearms are a lower percentage there than they were in DC 48 years ago or in DC and Prince George’s 14 years ago.  These numbers are far from precise. The strong possibility of selection bias exists. The numbers show the percentage of homemade guns is not necessarily increasing, and may even be dropping. This makes sense as Second Amendment rights are being restored across much of the United States.

In a nation with over 500 million firearms in private hands, it is usually easier for people who desire an untraceable firearm to purchase one on the unregulated market, have another person purchase one in the regulated market, or steal one, than to make your own. Hundreds of millions guns in the United States are unregistered and untraceable.

A few thousand or a few million “Ghost guns” will not make a measurable difference.

Analysis: Homemade firearms have always existed. The right to make your own firearm has always been part of the Second Amendment. The push to require government permission to make your own firearm is part of the Progressive ideology to ignore or destroy limits on government power. It has very little, if any effect on criminals. It has significant effect on law abiding citizens. The desire to require serial numbers on homemade guns stems from the desire to impose universal registration of guns on the population of the United States. The ability to make your own gun defeats the idea of Universal Registration. Registration of Guns is, in effect, confiscation of guns.

The right to make and have your own guns, independent of government permission, is embodied in the ability to make and keep “Ghost guns”.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

Source: http://gunwatch.blogspot.com/2024/12/pbs-in-philadelphia-police-expert-says.html