Planet X Now 15 Degrees South of Our Equator (Video)

What can be learned by studying earthquake patterns? When studying archives one can plainly see a pattern associated with May and November every single year.

What is it about May and November that gives us 2 to 3 weeks of earthquakes with the strongest of earthquakes signaling the beginning and an end of a sequence? According to the scientists and physicists in the video featured below it is no accident and in fact has been as predictable as the rooster crowing in the morning. This year, May 2017, a shift in the pattern was seen and the big quakes signifying the end of an alignment in May happened later than they have for several years.

When searching for a 90 degree alignment that would be geoeffective, the only alignment that overlapped a cluster of earthquakes that shook the globe in mid-June. These quakes roughly 7.0 occurred in the span of 48 hours in Guatemala, Peru, Greece, and Alaska.

The confusing thing about an Aquarial alignment is that Neptune resides there. And the claim that Neptune has been creating the May and November earthquakes would seem to be a valid argument. I was successfully able to contact the video makers and pose this very question to them.

“We have made hundreds of earthquake predictions not using the outer planets because gravity (the weak force) diminishes in strength by a factor that is cubed. That factor is distance. In recent torque equations demonstrated that Mercury has more influence upon the Sun than does Uranus or Neptune,” said a physicist associated with the Higher Truth Channel.

To anyone who has ever followed this particular Channel their alignment dates for earthquakes and prediction dates for earthquakes did not match the position of Neptune for the last year and a half to 2 years. About 3 and a half years ago the geo effective point in Aquarius nearly matched Neptune’s position and has slowly but surely progressed away from that geo effective point. The other confusing factor is that in some years Jupiter and Venus can overlap their geo effective influences with that of Aquarius.

After carefully studying the earthquake archives one can see about a 3 week pattern in May and November. That pattern starts out early with the stronger quakes and ends with equal if not stronger quakes. The other change in pattern that is a crucial piece to the puzzle is the softening of magnitudes that should not be occurring if in fact a large object is getting closer and closer. Either that object has to have reached its closest point to the solar system and is now leaving or it is actually adhering to Harrington’s model and diving underneath our solar system on its final approach. This would then allow it to lose a magnetic connection to our North Pole while strengthening its connection to our South Pole. The effect this should have is to grab ahold of the South Pole and stabilize Earth’s wobble. That then would account for the softening of magnitudes especially obvious during the February quake season. This would also explain why Polaris for some reason seemed to be rather still between January and March 2017.

There is a way to test this theory by looking at the horizontal plates and the subsidence zones. As this Channel has pointed out the alignments with Earth and Jupiter or Earth and Aquarius (and the Sun) have routinely affected all subsidence zones and super calderas the same. So when we look at what the subsidence faults and subsidence zones have done we can see a very noticeable increase in activity since the start of these alignments in April. The other way to determine if Planet X has grabbed ahold of our South Pole is to check the horizontal faults at the top and bottom of the globe to see if those normally very quiet zones have started to increase. As these physicists point out the Arctic and Antarctic faults have been moving and shifting for about 9 months.

The conclusion as to the location of a geo effective object in Aquarius (brown dwarf) then would not only conform to astronomer Harrington’s model but when looking at the earthquake patterns and signatures nothing exists in the patterns that would contradict that model. In fact, conversely, the earthquake patterns actually support Harrington’s model of Planet X and its orbit.

The end conclusion that Planet X is directly south of Neptune and at least 10 degrees below the celestial equator during the night. The video contains archived links for your scrutiny and personal research.

So what can this reporter conclude? It is kind of hard to contradict a group of individuals whose track record remains virtually unblemished in terms of predicting and explaining earthquakes and their patterns. It would be hard to argue against the facts as well. What most people don’t even realize is the notion that we may now be able to also estimate the time of perihelion to the Sun (closest approach)! To me, the sharpness of the shift would indicate a Kuiper Belt orbit rather than an Oort Cloud orbit to this brown dwarf. The video goes into more detail and gives additional explanation.

https://youtu.be/V8vabCViQBY