Harvey Weinstein to “Anti-Semites”: “Kick These Guys in the Ass”

Harvey Weinstein to “Anti-Semites”: “Kick These Guys in the Ass”

Posted by Jonas E. Alexis on March 28, 2015 http://www.veteranstoday.com/2015/03/28/harvey-weinstein-to-anti-semites-kick-these-guys-in-the-ass/

Weinstein brags:

“I think it’s time that we, as Jews, get together with the Muslims who are honorable and peaceful — but we [also] have to go and protect ourselves. We have to build, once again, back into the breach. There’s a quote from Kurt Vonnegut’s book The Sirens of Titan and it always was the motto of Miramax and now The Weinstein Company.

“It says, ‘Good can triumph over evil if the angels are as organized as the mafia.’ That’s how we built our company! And, unfortunately, we [Jews] are gonna have to get as organized as the mafia. We just can’t take it anymore. We just can’t take these things. There’s gotta be a way to fight back….We need to stand up and kick these guys in the ass.’

“While we must be understanding of our Arab brothers and our Islamic brothers, we also have to understand that these crazy bastards [Arab and Islamic extremists] are also killing their own — they’re killing neighbors, they’re killing people from all sorts of different races.

“And, unlike World War II, when we didn’t act right away and we paid the price, we better start acting now. Trust me, I’m the last guy who wants to do anything about it, but I realize if we don’t, we will perish. We can’t allow the bad guys to win. So, as they say in The Godfather, ‘back to the mattresses,’ and back to the idea that we will not ever forget what happened to us.”

If you haven’t noticed already, you should realize that in the Zionist universe, Zionist birds always flock together. Always. They comfort each other. They receive great accolades among their own Zionist brethren, and they brag about how they aspire to terrorize the Goyim with an ideological fist.

Let us go back to Weinstein’s preliminary assumption, that “anti-Semitism” has nothing to do with Jewish behavior and has a lot to do with people simply hating Jews. Is he really that stupid? Don’t these people brag about having high IQ? Why can’t Weinstein figure out a simple formula? Didn’t Weinstein defend Jewish pedophiles like Roman Polanski?

This brings us face to face with Ovadia Yosef’s statement:

“Goyim were born only to serve Jews. Without that, they have no place in the world—only to serve the people of Israel.

“With gentiles, it will be like any person – they need to die, but [God] will give them longevity. Why? Imagine that one’s donkey would die, they’d lose their money.

“This is his servant… That’s why he gets a long life, to work well for this Jew. Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat… That is why gentiles were created.”

This racism flows directly from the teachings of the Talmud:

“The Talmud cites certain passages in the Old Testament to justify its racism, as when it claims, ‘O seed of Abraham, the Lord has spoken to you through Ezekiel’s mouth: you are my sheephold; that is, you are human beings, whereas the other peoples of this world are not at all humans, but beasts.’ Certain consequences flow from Talmud racism. For example:

“‘The Jew who rapes and kills a non-Jewish woman must be absolved in court, because he has done evil to ‘a mare.’ Maimonides, who is considered infallible in the ghettos, states in his treatise on homicide that the Israelite who kills a goy or a non-Jewish man cannot be punished. Doesn’t that suffice? One of the books of Israel that has authority seriously asserts that ‘the non-Jews are black animals’ or, in other words, wild boars.

“‘And so in such a way are treated all those who aren’t of its nationality by this race, that by its sexual excesses, was disgusting even to the Romans of the Caesars’ epoch, so that Tacitus called it proiectissima ad libidinem gens [a people wholly addicted to debauchery].’”

With respect to making peace with the Arabs, the good rabbi declared,

“How can you make peace with a snake? Those evildoers, the Arabs—it says in the Gemara [Talmud] that God is sorry he ever created those sons of Ishmael.”

Ovadia Yosef, Harvey Weinsten, Eli Roth, among others, are largely responsible for “anti-Semitism” or anti-Jewish reactions, which they claim have nothing to do with Jewish behavior. As Jewish historians themselves have argued, this anti-Jewish reaction cannot be separated from Jewish vices. Jewish historian Samuel Roth did not hesitate to write that everything the Jews see “is only to be won away with the superior brain with which God has endowed his chosen ones. Each of them, when he grows up, becomes an agency of cunning to defeat the civil law. The Polish Jew does not remain in Poland. He migrates.

“Eventually he finds himself a rich nest in England, in France, in Germany, in America, in one of the South American countries. To each of the counties of his invasion the Jew brings the whole bag of commercial tricks and statutory maneuvers with which he poisons the arteries of the civilized world.”

Lastly, Weinstein can never explain to us what he means by “anti-Semitism” precisely because if the word is defined in a logical manner, then it will lose its political force. For instance, in 1988, Jewish journalist and Hollywood historian Neal Gabler wrote his influential book An Empire of their Own: How Jews Invented Hollywood.

Six years later, in 1994, British journalist William Cash adopted Gabler’s premise, arguing that Jews largely invented Hollywood in an article for the highly-read British journal Spectator.

Gabler, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Cash was simply reiterating the sentiments of An Empire of their Own, called Cash’s article an “anti-Semitic bleat from a reactionary crackpot”!

This attitude is appalling, but unfortunately it has become the rule rather than the exception among many Jewish writers and ideologues.

But the fact of the matter is that nearly all serious Jewish writers know that Hollywood is a Jewish town. Jewish journalist Joel Stein did not hesitate to write in the LA Times in 2008 that “Jews totally run Hollywood.” Here is Stein’s assessment:  “How deeply Jewish is Hollywood? When the studio chiefs took out a full-page ad in the Los Angeles Times a few weeks ago to demand that the Screen Actors Guild settle its contract, the open letter was signed by:

“News Corp. President Peter Chernin (Jewish), Paramount Pictures Chairman Brad Grey (Jewish), Walt Disney Co. Chief Executive Robert Iger (Jewish), Sony Pictures Chairman Michael Lynton (surprise, Dutch Jew), Warner Bros. Chairman Barry Meyer (Jewish), CBS Corp. Chief Executive Leslie Moonves (so Jewish his great uncle was the first prime minister of Israel), MGM Chairman Harry Sloan (Jewish) and NBC Universal Chief Executive Jeff Zucker (mega-Jewish).

Jewish talk show host Michael Medved wrote back in 1996, “It makes no sense at all to try to deny the reality of Jewish power and prominence in popular culture…Any list of the most influential production executives at each of the major movie studios will produce a heavy majority of recognizably Jewish names.”

Medved also brought up the fact that the Disney studios were the product of a Gentile, but when Disney died in 1984, Michael Eisner took over and began to hire “highly paid Jewish moguls” such as Jeffrey Katzenberg, Michael Ovitz, and Joe Roth. By the end of that decade, Disney featured “Jewish personnel in nearly all its most powerful positions.”

The simple question is this: is Weinstein going to deny all these facts? If yes, what kind of evidence will he accept? And why doesn’t he prove the “anti-Semites” wrong by leaving the industry? Why doesn’t he start a campaign saying things like, “We are going to dismantle the anti-Semites by facts: we Jews are going to be a minority in Hollywood and will stop producing pornography as a way of corrupting the culture.”

I am pretty sure the so-called anti-Semites will disappear if Weinstein takes those steps. In fact, no “anti-Semite” hates people like Gilad Atmon and Norman Finkelstein and Amy Goodman and other decent people.

Put simply, Weinstein has to take some responsibility for anti-Jewish reactions around the world. If he still denies this, then perhaps it is time to assert that Weinstein is part of the traditional foe of the West. This is precisely why documents such as Civilta Cattolica forbade those people to take media position because they will corrupt the culture and reduce virtually everyone into “metaphysical nothingness.”

“Everywhere they paraded and parade their avid ambition; everywhere they bragged and brag about their divinely given superiority over the people among whom they lived and live; everywhere they showed and show themselves to be intractable, hostile and malevolent towards the nations that tolerated or tolerate them and even bestowed or bestow upon them the blessing of the right of citizenship.”

If they have no respect for the moral law, nations have the right to defend themselves against this “metaphysical nothingness,” which never respects truth.